Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : GPUGRID and ATI
Author | Message |
---|---|
If you have a new 5870 ATI GPUs please accept beta work from us, in the following days we will try to upload a new ATI application. | |
ID: 13411 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
..... Done. Looking forward to some WUs. | |
ID: 13414 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I'll try a few too ... | |
ID: 13415 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
If you have a new 5870 ATI GPUs please accept beta work from us, in the following days we will try to upload a new ATI application. what about a 2600 xt? | |
ID: 13416 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Well i've got 1 machine with a HD4850. | |
ID: 13421 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
It could be fine as well. | |
ID: 13423 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
It could be fine as well. k, project added to ati gpu computer.. | |
ID: 13424 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
no, only 4000 series and up will run opencl. nvidia 8 series and higher will too. | |
ID: 13434 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
hi, | |
ID: 13435 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
The minimum card is a Radeon 4850. Below this one shared memory is emulated so it is terribly slow. As OpenCL requires the shared memory (local address space in OpenCL) to offer general read write access, only the HD5000 line will natively support this. At least that is the official information. Actually it is a bit strange as the HD4000 shared memory supports different addressing modes and should be usable in several scenarios without the need to emulate it with (slow) global memory (DX11 Compute allows the use of shared memory also with SM4.1 GPUs like the HD4000 series for example). | |
ID: 13438 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
hi, You have to have an AMD account to download those. ____________ Reno, NV Team: SETI.USA | |
ID: 13439 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I am getting: | |
ID: 13440 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Yes, | |
ID: 13442 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I'm a bit confused, if I install these BETA Driver Files with the Installer which are different than the ATI Drivers I already have installed can I still run Collatz or Milkyway with the Drivers. ??? | |
ID: 13443 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I have no idea. The driver should not affect it as it is newer, however the only way is to try. If you don't want to stop production for beta work don't change it. | |
ID: 13444 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
There are 5 workunits out to be grabbed. | |
ID: 13445 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Do we really need to install the 2) ATI-opencl-sdk stream SDK as it's just a Developer ??? | |
ID: 13447 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I attached a system with an ATI HD4850 to GPUGRID. Boinv Version 6.10.18. | |
ID: 13448 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
SKG, I wouldn't expect a lot of work to begin with, their just feeling the ATI Cards out is all I think ... | |
ID: 13449 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I'm a bit confused, if I install these BETA Driver Files with the Installer which are different than the ATI Drivers I already have installed can I still run Collatz or Milkyway with the Drivers. ??? On Vista and Win7 yes, with WinXP Collatz will run. MW will likely still be influenced by the same WinXP driver issue introduced half a year ago (but not tested). The problem is that it is still in beta stage (and expires sometimes in january). The OpenCL compatibility should be integrated to the normal driver release hopefully with Cat 9.12 or 10.1. | |
ID: 13450 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I'm running the Collatz Wu's on my i7 with Win XP 64-bit & the New Beta Drivers, they were released 10-8-09 (CAT 9.11 & CAL Version 1.4.467) CAT 9.10 is CAL Version 1.4.368 ... Haven't received any Wu's yet though for the 5870 Cards in the Box. | |
ID: 13451 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Drivers and SDK are required. | |
ID: 13452 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We managed to try on a 4850 and shared memory is still emulated, so the card seems to be quite slow. | |
ID: 13455 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Drivers and SDK are required. Yes I'm accepting BETA Work from GPU Grid, I have the the Drivers & SDK both installed too on THIS BOX ... | |
ID: 13456 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I have performed a server update to see if things change. | |
ID: 13459 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I can ask for work but don't get any work: | |
ID: 13460 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
humm, one host got one task now. | |
ID: 13461 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
You must be logged in to download tools from AMD Developer Central | |
ID: 13462 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I know it is annoying to log on, but it is quick at least. | |
ID: 13464 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
TO: poorboy | |
ID: 13465 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
humm, one host got one task now. I had to stop Collatz to get the 4 GPUGrid Wu's to run but they only ran about 2 Seconds before Erring out. They also locked up the System for a little while after erring out but it cleared itself and started running again without re-booting ... | |
ID: 13466 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
4870x2, got both packages from ATI as instructed! | |
ID: 13468 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
So, at least the server now works. | |
ID: 13475 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We have tested on Windows XP and Windows Vista. Where are you running? | |
ID: 13476 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We have tested on Windows XP and Windows Vista. Where are you running? windows 7. | |
ID: 13479 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I'm running Windows XP Pro SP2 64-Bit, It's the only System I running on my Pharm so I have no other System to Test on ... | |
ID: 13480 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I'm running Windows XP Pro SP2 64-Bit, It's the only System I running on my Pharm so I have no other System to Test on ... Looks like only one wingman made it through and validated, whoever that is! http://www.gpugrid.net/show_host_detail.php?hostid=56045 http://www.gpugrid.net/workunit.php?wuid=930617 | |
ID: 13481 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
He has XP32 which is what we have tested. | |
ID: 13483 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
the 32bit app crashed on my 64bit Win7 too.... | |
ID: 13484 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
He has XP32 which is what we have tested. Why would a 64-Bit OS be a problem if the Video Cards is doing the Work ??? Or does the CPU share duties with the Video Card running the ATI Wu's ??? | |
ID: 13486 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
He has XP32 which is what we have tested. The 32bit application is linked against the 32bit libraries and the 32bit opencl.dll. And you can't install the 32bit OpenCL SDK on a 64bit system, so I think the 32bit version of this dll is simply missing. I hope they will fix it when it gets a normal part of the graphics driver (the 64bit driver contains 32bit as well as 64 bit version of the CAL libraries for example). | |
ID: 13488 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
It seems to be working with my XP64 machine, with a 4870. | |
ID: 13489 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
But just FYI, this is showing in the sdterr out: I think it just means that there was no checkpoint found. | |
ID: 13490 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
zombie: | |
ID: 13491 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
He has XP32 which is what we have tested. my windows 7 is 32 bit! | |
ID: 13492 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
zombie: The SDK is 64 bit. I can't tell from the Driver name if it is 32 or 64. The site is currently down, so I can't double check. Why? Did it not crunch properly? Edit: FYI, two more tasks completed and validated. 4 of 4 now. ____________ Reno, NV Team: SETI.USA | |
ID: 13494 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
If you have a new 5870 ATI GPUs please accept beta work from us, in the following days we will try to upload a new ATI application.In editing GPUGRID preferences, there is twice Use Central Processing Unit (CPU). It's a bit confising at least. | |
ID: 13497 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
More WUs out. | |
ID: 13499 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
More WUs out. I just noticed I have 5 or 6 Wu's on my i7 Box that haven't run yet. All I have is the 64 Bit SDK but I'll reinstall it before running them ... PS: All 6 Wu ran just a few Seconds & still gave a Computation Error ... HERE I uninstalled the 64-bit SDK Version and installed the 32-Bit SDK Version, if I get some more Wu's I'll try them with the 32-Bit SDK Version ... | |
ID: 13500 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hi, | |
ID: 13501 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I get calc errors too :( | |
ID: 13502 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Edit: FYI, two more tasks completed and validated. 4 of 4 now. 10 for 10 now. All valid and credit granted. ____________ Reno, NV Team: SETI.USA | |
ID: 13503 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hi, | |
ID: 13504 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hi, That's almost the exact same thing that happens when I try to run them on my 5870's & 64-Bit Windows OS ... | |
ID: 13505 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Edit: FYI, two more tasks completed and validated. 4 of 4 now. Quit Gloating ... :P ... ;) | |
ID: 13506 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I'm 1/1 although 5 wingmen had 'error while computing- http://www.gpugrid.net/workunit.php?wuid=930617 | |
ID: 13507 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Could just be the 48xx Cards will run them & the 58xx Cards won't, I don't have a whole lot of success running the Milkyway Wu's either with my 5870 Cards. For that matter the last time I tried a week or so ago my 4870 Cards didn't have much success running the Milkyway Wu's either. Lot's of VPU errors across the Pharm trying to run them. | |
ID: 13508 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I carely reinstalled the drivers and the SDK on this pc | |
ID: 13510 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hi, first of all, i have to say, that i'm happy about the progress of adding Ati to GPUGRID. I just read about it and did install all the stuff from the AMD-Homepage. But everytime i'm crunching get an error. Looking in the task shows this: | |
ID: 13511 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Ok, I'm in! I just received a 5850 yesterday, and managed to find another one yesterday--which I promptly ordered....it will be here early next week. ;) | |
ID: 13516 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
It unzips two separate installers to the directory you specified (one file is the SDK the other one contains sample code). After they're unzipped you still need to install the SDK from this directory (you probably can skip the samples). | |
ID: 13517 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
So far: | |
ID: 13518 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Ok, Thank You, but still the same thing. I installed both files from the temp directory and rebooted. Detached, shutdown boinc, re-attached....no dice. :( So far: Well, these card(s) will be pounding collatz for now, but just let me know what You need. I've been with GpuGrid for quite a while....was hoping the ATI day would come! ;) I'll keep an eye on this thread, but feel free to send a PM or email... Also wanted to give a personal Thanx! to Gispel! GpuGrid is a great project and I was hoping you would find your way here!! | |
ID: 13519 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
If OpenCL is a/the problem - dont use it - maybe this project could use CAL&Brook like the other projects too (Collatz, Milkyway) | |
ID: 13520 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Just had 7 Error out on a Dual 4850 X2 Box ... :( | |
ID: 13521 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Also wanted to give a personal Thanx! to Gispel! GpuGrid is a great project and I was hoping you would find your way here!! But I have nothing contributed here. The credit has to go to GDF and his team for porting the CUDA application to OpenCL. Unfortunately the shared memory of the HD4000 line gets no support from OpenCL (so it is really slow, only HD5000 line is properly supported). I guess porting it to yet another platform may be a little bit too much effort to ask for. OpenCL and CUDA share a lot of similarities, so it is comparatively easy port. Other platforms have a slightly different philosophy, which would need a lot more effort to support. I could imagine the project would really like to see the OpenCL environments from both ATI and nvidia to mature fast (and to show similar performance characteristics to the CUDA version in case of nvidia, i.e. not slower). If that is the case in let's say a few month from now, it may be beneficial to maintain only the OpenCL version which would be supported by all platforms (nvidia, ATI, CPUs, and possibly also Cell for PS3). But one has to see first how this whole OpenCL thing develops before declaring this as a goal. | |
ID: 13522 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
a nice hello for all here ;-) | |
ID: 13523 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Also wanted to give a personal Thanx! to Gispel! GpuGrid is a great project and I was hoping you would find your way here!! Absolutely agreed. The GpuGrid team has always worked very diligently to get and keep this project up and running. I've seen a number of positive comments over time from folks coming from other projects. Over time issues are a given...it's how they are handled that makes all the difference.... Maybe I've misunderstood something, but my understanding is that you are 1 of the keys to getting ATI going on MW and Collatz....I don't claim to understand CUDA and CAL and OpenGL and all that...;) But if my understanding is correct (on MW and Collatz)....you've still got a lot to offer here on this advancement. And, Yes, Many Thanx to GDF et al! This project started on the edge and does a great job of staying there. Much Respect for the continued advancement of this technology! ---------------- Still just telling me that I don't have an Nvidia GPU :( | |
ID: 13529 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Gipsel is welcome to help. In a sense is doing it already by writing on this forum. Unfortunately for us, he could not really help with the code as the code is accessed only by few people. Your experience on ATI and Nvidia will be very valuable for us. | |
ID: 13531 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
If OpenCL is a/the problem - dont use it - maybe this project could use CAL&Brook like the other projects too (Collatz, Milkyway) Unfortunately neither OpenCL, nor CAL/Brook+ have FFT libraries at the moment. Cuda does. The GPUgrid app uses FFT functions as does Seti and Einstein. Gipsel feel free to correct me if I am wrong, but as far as I know Collatz and Milkyway don't use FFT functions. OpenCL offers the project code compatibility for the ATI and Nvidia cards, they just need to be compiled with the appropiate compiler. This is why the projects would like to move to using OpenCL. ____________ BOINC blog | |
ID: 13533 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Is it possible to use a 3rd party FFT library? | |
ID: 13534 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
FFT will not be a problem at first. | |
ID: 13538 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Well, I just picked up a 3rd 5850 via HF/XFX combo deal. Shipping today. So, by this time next week I will have 3x 5850s in hand. | |
ID: 13539 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I'm ready too but have set mt Box to NNW for now, unless there's something new to try I can't see spitting out just error's & having the Box Hang as a result of them. I'll keep an eye on the Thread and if something new is going to be tried I'll try & grab a few ... :) | |
ID: 13540 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
So, we are waiting to receive a 5870 which we ordered and in meanwhile cleaning up the code. But I think that most likely the ATI SDK is the problem (maybe a new release will help). We will also test under windows7 from now on, so to make windows 7 the recommended OS. | |
ID: 13542 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
So, we are waiting to receive a 5870 which we ordered and in meanwhile cleaning up the code. But I think that most likely the ATI SDK is the problem (maybe a new release will help). We will also test under windows7 from now on, so to make windows 7 the recommended OS. Sounds Good, GDF. I did have a question on the OS. I use mainly Vista x64, but I do currently have 2 rigs running Win7 RC. I'm not real happy with the win7 RC, maybe I just need to burn a new ISO, but whatever. Do I need to try to find a cheap copy of Win7? Also, some 5870s seem to have boot issues. Are you aware of this? If not, I'll try to relocate some links.... | |
ID: 13543 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
No, | |
ID: 13544 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Ok, I understand. I'll have 3 cards in hand next week. Still looking to pick up a 4th. Then a WCing solution! Running short on cash....So, which version of Win7: HP, Pro? Not really looking to spend for Ultimate unless absolutely necessary. Checking out the "Family packs".... | |
ID: 13545 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Also, some 5870s seem to have boot issues. Are you aware of this? If not, I'll try to relocate some links I'm running 10 5870's of 3 different Brands in 5 Box's under Windows XP Pro SP2 64-Bit without any Boot Problems. I have 3 in my lone i7 that Boots up way faster than it ever did with the NVIDIA GTX 200 Series Video Cards it had in it before. | |
ID: 13546 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Sounds good, so we're 11 for 11 atm... | |
ID: 13547 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I have 15 Box's, all have Quad Cores in them 6600 - 6700 - 9450 Variity & 1 i7 920 ... All the Box's have Gigabyte DQ6's of Various Models as they came out DQ6 - X38 DQ6's - and a X58 Extreme for the i7 ... | |
ID: 13548 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Ok, well, this particular person determined their issue to be how they plugged up their psu: | |
ID: 13551 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
FFT will not be a problem at first. how much work in the WU's is fft's? they run quite fast from what i have seen on ATi cards, like video transcoding. it almost seems like their architecture is designed for signal processing rather than graphics. i saw an AMD slideshow that had an optimized fft running at 300 GFLOPs on a 4870. thats with LDS too. | |
ID: 13565 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
The ffts take something like 20% of the time, but they are many short FFTs. | |
ID: 13566 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
The ffts take something like 20% of the time, but they are many short FFTs. maybe you could find something interesting going on here http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=102635 | |
ID: 13574 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We are still waiting for the 5870 to come. Sorry for the delay. | |
ID: 13615 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We are still waiting for the 5870 to come. Sorry for the delay. Sounds Goods. For me, everything is in house and operational, except Win7. It should be here Tues, then it's time to wipe some HDs and see about the clean installs from the upgrade disk.... In the mean time, with MW being down, it looks like we're going to melt the Collatz server to the floor.....LMAO ;) | |
ID: 13617 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We are still waiting for the 5870 to come. Sorry for the delay. I'll send 1 of mine if it will help you, PM me if you want to go that way, of course you would have to send it back ... I sure hope you get this going soon as Collatz & Milkyway are Complete Flops a lot of times like right now. Most of my ATI Cards are just sitting Idle & have been for quite awhile now because Collatz & Milkyway are down and may be down for ??? Hopefully this Project can keep them busier than the other 2 Projects can ... PS: Right now the 5870's & 5850's are now where to be had, and with the release of the 5970 the 5850's will even be harder to come by ... IMO | |
ID: 13618 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
But there are WU for ATI? | |
ID: 13637 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I updated beta drivers + OpenCL SDK as requested | |
ID: 13638 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
@GDF | |
ID: 13647 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
poorboy ...I sure hope you get this going soon as Collatz & Milkyway are Complete Flops a lot of times like right now. Most of my ATI Cards are just sitting Idle & have been for quite awhile now because Collatz & Milkyway are down and may be down for ??? You could use them on Folding@home | |
ID: 13651 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
poorboy...I sure hope you get this going soon as Collatz & Milkyway are Complete Flops a lot of times like right now. Most of my ATI Cards are just sitting Idle & have been for quite awhile now because Collatz & Milkyway are down and may be down for ??? If that's true--I would like to know. My understanding is that everyone is waiting on the release of GPU3. ??? | |
ID: 13652 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
poorboy...I sure hope you get this going soon as Collatz & Milkyway are Complete Flops a lot of times like right now. Most of my ATI Cards are just sitting Idle & have been for quite awhile now because Collatz & Milkyway are down and may be down for ??? I only run the BOINC Projects, they'll sit Idle before I run Folding@home ... | |
ID: 13655 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
There is a client for ATI F@H but it currently does not produce as well as Nvidia cards do. | |
ID: 13657 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
For me Folding@home is better than doing nothing, but that is my preference and your quite intitled to yours. | |
ID: 13663 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Given that production of top end NVidia cards has stopped, bringing in ATI support is a good thing. Such fundamental software design decisions shouldn't be based on temporary circumstances such as yield and capacity problems at a foundry. Give it a couple of months and Fermi will be here (just not that many). And it will be one large, expensive power hungry performance beast. But there'll also be its smaller siblings with more sane transistor counts. MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 | |
ID: 13669 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
poorboy...I sure hope you get this going soon as Collatz & Milkyway are Complete Flops a lot of times like right now. Most of my ATI Cards are just sitting Idle & have been for quite awhile now because Collatz & Milkyway are down and may be down for ??? Collatz & Milkyway are both up and running. I keep looking her for a ATI app, but it don't look like you will be supporting my 4850 at this time. | |
ID: 13670 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
poorboy...I sure hope you get this going soon as Collatz & Milkyway are Complete Flops a lot of times like right now. Most of my ATI Cards are just sitting Idle & have been for quite awhile now because Collatz & Milkyway are down and may be down for ??? I was hoping to get a 3rd ATI project for my HD4850 as well. :-) ____________ Greetings from Cori | |
ID: 13671 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
from what we have seen the performance on the HD4xxx series is very very slow. | |
ID: 13675 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
The ffts take something like 20% of the time, but they are many short FFTs. https://developer.apple.com/mac/library/samplecode/OpenCL_FFT/index.html here it is source code for a fairly complete library for FFT (made by Apple, but should be easily ported). Don't know about the license, could it be without any? | |
ID: 13676 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
from what we have seen the performance on the HD4xxx series is very very slow. Hm, if a HD48590 is really considered as VERY SLOW I maybe should completely forget about crunching.... :-( ____________ Greetings from Cori | |
ID: 13682 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
To quantify GDF's remark about the speed of 48xx cards, we currently find that a 4850 runs our code about as fast as an NVidia 8600. This is almost entirely down to the lack of local shared memory and we have every reason to expect that the 5xxx cards, which have shared memory on the processor itself, will be significantly faster. We're still waiting for the postman, though! | |
ID: 13684 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
https://developer.apple.com/mac/library/samplecode/OpenCL_FFT/index.html Thanks for the link, cenit. There are several FFT OpenCL projects we're watching - hopefully one will have all the features we need soon (In case you are wondering, these are: batched 1D r2c and c2r transforms with an FFTW-like interface and data-layout). Alas, we don't have the resources to develop one in-house at the moment. MJH | |
ID: 13685 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
from what we have seen the performance on the HD4xxx series is very very slow. Or run out and buy 5xxx series cards ... :) Then again it may be a "temporary" thing when ATI hears about it ... there may be a way to change the API so that this stops being an issue. Sometimes they can be real clever these software types. Remember the OpenCL is very new ... Heck, we are a year plus into GPU computing on BOINC and it is still not working as well as it should ... | |
ID: 13689 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Is it slow because it uses system RAM or just does not have any GPU Cache RAM??? | |
ID: 13691 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
graphics dont really need cache so ATi can get away with out having it working for now. GPGPU is a very different story. btw, its not technically a cache. its called local data share. as of now only brook and IL have support for LDS. its the exact same reason folding@home is so slow on ATi cards. to give you an idea of how fast LDS is vram is 115GB/s and LDS is 1.9TB/s on a 4870, a lot of apps need that bandwidth which is almost 20x faster than main memory access. Is it slow because it uses system RAM or just does not have any GPU Cache RAM??? the cache is there but it will take a driver update to get it working so for now its vram. | |
ID: 13692 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I updated beta drivers + OpenCL SDK as requested Exaclty the same here (except for having client 6.10.18). Same GPU/OS. Enabled doing Beta Work in the account settings. But still getting no work. I'm looking forward to help you, but don't know how. Johannes | |
ID: 13693 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I updated beta drivers + OpenCL SDK as requested And even with my slow HD4850 I'd like to do some test WUs before giving up here but well... I don't get work either. *grin* I've updated my account settings, drivers and the sdk package but no success. ____________ Greetings from Cori | |
ID: 13697 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We are not giving work yet. Waiting for a ATI5870 to test. | |
ID: 13699 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Any updates? Did you contact PoorBoy on his generous offer? This is the project I wish to see 5xxx implemented, then I will go and buy these cards. I'm not prepared to do that just for mathematical problems (Collatz), but this project and the science made makes it almost sound smart ;) | |
ID: 13748 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We could not find a 5870, but we got a 5850 that should be good enough. | |
ID: 13753 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Would any of the WU's require double precision? The new 57xx's apparently don't have support for it... | |
ID: 13754 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We could not find a 5870, but we got a 5850 that should be good enough. I find this interesting that in the USA there is no ATI 5800/5900 GPUs Even in far distant New Zealand I can get ATI 5970 in 3 days. I would love to crunch GPUGRID again but had to give up with a 295. I am cruching Collatz now because a 5790 can rip though the WUs 2 every 7 mins. So come get a optiz - app for ATI cards . You are missing out on so much Computer Power Ross ____________ | |
ID: 13755 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We are working on the optimization now. We will not put the application out until it delivers what a 5870 should deliver in terms of performance. Be patient. | |
ID: 13766 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
| |
ID: 13773 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We are working on the optimization now. We will not put the application out until it delivers what a 5870 should deliver in terms of performance. Be patient. Some of us are getting too old to have Patience ... :) | |
ID: 13774 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We are working on the optimization now. We will not put the application out until it delivers what a 5870 should deliver in terms of performance. Be patient. Great, I will be patient! Ross ____________ | |
ID: 13777 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Well, if the performance of 5850(70) would be equal to the performance of nVidia top devices, this optimization will be successful, otherwise no one would use their top ATI cards with PPD of 2 years old nVidia. But honestly I hope ATI would outperform nVidia in this very important project. Good Luck Fellows. | |
ID: 13801 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Despite credits GPU-Grid has one major advantage compared to both other BOINC projects for ATI: it's got a reliable server and enough work. If MW and Collatz were running fine, they'd offer enough work as well.. but for now MW still crashes rather often and when ever this happens the Collatz server is brought to its knees. GPU-Grid could bring some balance to the force ;) | |
ID: 13802 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Despite credits GPU-Grid has one major advantage compared to both other BOINC projects for ATI: it's got a reliable server and enough work. If MW and Collatz were running fine, they'd offer enough work as well.. but for now MW still crashes rather often and when ever this happens the Collatz server is brought to its knees. GPU-Grid could bring some balance to the force ;) I agree, Collatz has been down for about 2 Days now so I'm forced to run Milkyway which I don't particularly like to do anymore because I have to Babysit my Box's to much to keep an eye out for VPU Errors which I don't get running Collatz. So having a Third Option here at GPUGrid will be most welcome even if it doesn't Pay as much as Collatz or Milkyway ... | |
ID: 13803 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Agreed. I have my old 9800 GTX+ on this, but I would really like to use my 5870 on a project that will do mankind some real good. I like MW and all, I think it's neat, but well, you know. F@H still hasn't updated their ATI app to work properly with them either, so not a lot of options out there for us ATI primary crunchers. | |
ID: 13814 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I am looking forward to this. I'll pull the trigger on some 5870s as soon as they work on the Grid. They are still hard to find but that should improve too. | |
ID: 13853 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Any update? I'm looking to get some 5870s. I won't do it unless they can contribute here. | |
ID: 13914 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Duplicate post. Don't see how to delete it... I haven't found any way to completely delete a post on GPUGRID, but for perhaps an hour after you post it you can edit the duplicate down to just one line: (duplicate) Also, once you've done that to two different posts, a duplicate post detector program (probably) will be able to detect two different posts from you with the same contents, and delete the second one for you. If the duplicate post detector is also able to do this for normal length posts, that's new enough I haven't seen it happen before. I'm still trying to find out what recommended Nvidia boards or ATI boards will fit either of my desktops by some means other than paying for both the boards and the service of installing them before finding out if they will fit at all; that still appears to be the best method available locally. I'm no longer able to handle the installation work by myself. | |
ID: 13917 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We are working on the code to get it faster on ATI and Nvidia. My impression is that the G300 will be faster, but it still early to say it. | |
ID: 13921 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I'm still trying to find out what recommended Nvidia boards or ATI boards will fit either of my desktops by some means other than paying for both the boards and the service of installing them before finding out if they will fit at all; that still appears to be the best method available locally. I'm no longer able to handle the installation work by myself. What cases/ cards are you thinking about? We should be able to determine from specs on the cases and the cards if they will fit and we can also see if we can find someone who has already tried the same case/ card configuration to confirm. ____________ Thanks - Steve | |
ID: 13946 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Thx GDF. Will be standing by. | |
ID: 13962 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We could not find a 5870, but we got a 5850 that should be good enough. it could be useful for you to have a computer (Q6600 + ATI5970) in remote control (LogMeIn or something else) to make your tests ? | |
ID: 13972 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hi to everyone, | |
ID: 13973 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Yes, your system could be useful. The 4xxx no, they cannot be supported. We could not find a 5870, but we got a 5850 that should be good enough. | |
ID: 13981 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Currently only Win XP32 is installed, computer is clean, used only for crunching. Yes, your system could be useful. The 4xxx no, they cannot be supported. | |
ID: 13983 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Where are the files for the ATI version ? | |
ID: 13990 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
| |
ID: 13992 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hi all,
Asus P7P55D 8GB G.Skill Ripsaw DDR3 1333 Powercolor Radeon HD 5770 500 GB Samsung F2 beQiuet Straight Power 400W Windows 7 Professional 64 bit
| |
ID: 13993 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Cool system, but your power supply unit looks a bit weak to me! | |
ID: 13995 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
...your system will melt. I have a i7 x3440 @ 3100 P55 motherborad, 4 Gb Ripsaw, 1 disk HD 5770 my system pulls 230 W from the plug (wattmeter) So a 400 W PSU will be OK but not quiet. | |
ID: 13999 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
The powersupply is perfect for this system: | |
ID: 14000 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
OK, you are sort of correct, but missed my somewhat hidden point. | |
ID: 14003 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
OK, good to know. | |
ID: 14005 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Although the card could be overheating, or there might be software bugs in the game, it might actually be the power supply to blame! | |
ID: 14007 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I have created a cc_config.xml with several apps that shall run in exclusive mode. This way BOINC automatically stops computing when e.g. a game runs. | |
ID: 14009 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
| |
ID: 14010 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
That´s what I thought, too. It doesn´t have anything to do with the PSU. I still believe my PSU is perfect for my system and that I will not encounter any problems with it :D. | |
ID: 14011 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
There are 2 ways you can determine if it is a PSU issue or not. | |
ID: 14012 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I don´t want to draw too much attention, so here´s just a URL: | |
ID: 14014 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
A lot of off-topic here, I'd like to read about ATI GPU support in GPUgrid instead of this chat here... | |
ID: 14018 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We are working on the code to get it faster on ATI and Nvidia. My impression is that the G300 will be faster, but it still early to say it. Stream 2.0 SDK is here (no more beta) http://developer.amd.com/GPU/ATISTREAMSDK/Pages/default.aspx | |
ID: 14021 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I know the HD 5770 only uses 108W max, but the recommended PSU is at least 500W, and some people suggest you need a PSU capable of 40A on the 12Vold rail. And may I suggest that these people are wrong? The point is that 108 W = 12 V * 9 A. So each card draws 9 A max, if we ignore any power draw at 3.3 V and 5 V. Why would one need 40 A for that? Only if the CPU draws 31 A at 12 V -> 372 W. Now that's one bad ass number even *Presshots* can only dream about ;) What he should approximately need is a PSU which puts the 9A @ 12 V on one rail and the max 95 W ~ 12 V * 8 A for the CPU onto another one. Both could even be fed from one of his 3 12 V rails at max 18 A (would be risky & silly, though). Although the card could be overheating, or there might be software bugs in the game, it might actually be the power supply to blame! Technically that's true, but I don't think that's happening here. From what I have seen I can tell you that games and GP-GPU don't mix well yet, be it ATI or NV. So some software problem is very likely. If you have an Amp/Watt meter, use it to see what Wattage and Ampages are being used when playing the game and when not. This works if you exceed total wattage. But you can not easily look into the PS, so you can't know if individual rails are overloaded (really nasty error). If it rises significantly or the amount of RAM usage rises significantly then obviously the GPU is drawing more Amps! If neither change significantly then there is no way it is a PSU issue. But if the load changes, it does not have to be a PSU problem ;) IMO there is on simple and almost reliable test for PSU problems: try a bigger (quality) one. If the problem goes away - you just found the reason. If not - look elsewhere. -> back to topic, it's a sticky after all *doh* MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 | |
ID: 14023 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I have just seen this. This is very good news. We are trying it out. We are working on the code to get it faster on ATI and Nvidia. My impression is that the G300 will be faster, but it still early to say it. | |
ID: 14024 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Sorry for the "chat". | |
ID: 14025 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Does this mean that all GPU-Projects can easily program ATI WUs now? Without further reading I'd say "as easy as before". It's still their proprietary Stream SDK and different from CUDA and OpenCL. MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 | |
ID: 14034 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
maybe interesting for you guys. | |
ID: 14038 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
What do I have to do to get some work units to download to my i7 with a couple of 5870's. Thanks | |
ID: 14056 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hello, I have 2 HD5870 and I would like to know when the new ATI application is planned for your project ? | |
ID: 14097 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I would also like to know! | |
ID: 14117 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
hi, | |
ID: 14118 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Worst cliffhanger ever. Keep up the good work. | |
ID: 14120 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
For the sake of my poor, though willing, GTS 250, give it a rest and make my 58' happy :-) | |
ID: 14128 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
hi, In the world of BOINC, no news is never good news ... :) I eagerly anticipate the good word ... faster applications are always welcome and I now have one 58xx class card so even if the ATI is not good enough for the 4xxx class and below, well, I have at least one more asset to apply ... and as the Nvidia cards die I may just move over to ATI for all ... Anyway, thanks for the update ... | |
ID: 14129 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I'm still trying to find out what recommended Nvidia boards or ATI boards will fit either of my desktops by some means other than paying for both the boards and the service of installing them before finding out if they will fit at all; that still appears to be the best method available locally. I'm no longer able to handle the installation work by myself. If HP says just what cases they're using, they make that information hidden well enough that I haven't found it yet. I'm no longer able to move them well enough to inspect the cases for case model numbers. Model numbers for the whole computers are SR5125CL and d5200t, though. I haven't chosen the GPU cards yet, so I'm interested in any that both fit and are able to run GPUGRID. | |
ID: 14132 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
robertmiles, | |
ID: 14152 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
So far, we still strongly suggest to wait for the Fermi-based Nvidia cards. | |
ID: 14153 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Even faster then HD5970? | |
ID: 14154 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
could you give us an idea of the performance from these new clients? specifically performance of 5870. or is it too early to tell? | |
ID: 14155 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Model numbers for the whole computers are SR5125CL and d5200t I took a look around the internet and found an interior picture of the d520t. The HP spec says it is an ATX size motherbpard and the picture shows no obstruction for the full with from the PCI-E slot to the edge of the board (being a full tower the HDD cage is not in the way from what I can see) so I think a full size card would fit fine. I will try looking again, maybe even find someone with the same case. We can always try calling HP and see if they will tell us what the exact layout is. I'll post back as soon as I have anything to report. ____________ Thanks - Steve | |
ID: 14156 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
So far, we still strongly suggest to wait for the Fermi-based Nvidia cards. we'll see how much NV faster then ATI 2morrow on CES :-) ____________ | |
ID: 14157 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
You will not see any new grafik card from NV on CES. They don't have it now on CES. But they say it is in production now. You have to wait until March. | |
ID: 14158 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Waiting is nice thing, but in March My Radeon HD5870 will be 6 month baby :) | |
ID: 14162 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
sorry to say buddy, but IT on CES :-) check the latest news and u'll see even pics :-) ____________ | |
ID: 14164 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hi I have 5840 ati gpu | |
ID: 14168 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
my card is 5870 | |
ID: 14169 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Model numbers for the whole computers are SR5125CL and d5200t I just thought of yet another option even more relevant to this thread, possibly helped by recently finding the web site of a nearby company likely to offer any home installation services needed: Are there any HD58xx cards likely to be suitable for the power supply the SR5125CL already has, and also likely to fit? Also, is GPUGRID interested in offering participants with more than one computer the option of accepting beta work on some machines, but not others, and possibly even setting the share of GPUGRID GPU use differently on those different machines? | |
ID: 14170 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Today we start to perform local performance tests on ATI. | |
ID: 14171 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
thank You for info | |
ID: 14172 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Today we start to perform local performance tests on ATI. pls keep us posted :-) where I can read about nvidia beta application? ____________ | |
ID: 14174 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
If you have a new 5870 ATI GPUs please accept beta work from us, in the following days we will try to upload a new ATI application. Where are any instructions on how to accept beta work? Or is arranged in such a way that no instructions are needed? | |
ID: 14179 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
If you have a new 5870 ATI GPUs please accept beta work from us, in the following days we will try to upload a new ATI application. Your project preferences page, change "Run test applications?" from 'no' to 'yes'. | |
ID: 14180 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
2010-01-12 16:16:35 GPUGRID Requesting new tasks for GPU | |
ID: 14181 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
On linux, | |
ID: 14190 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
| |
ID: 14191 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hi i operate ATI 5870 system win 7 64 bit | |
ID: 14192 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
there is currently no beta work for ATi cards. if you read the whole thread from the start you can see that the ATi client is currently getting ready for beta testing. | |
ID: 14194 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
GDF, | |
ID: 14227 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I'm not GDF, but if I remember correctly, a post earlier in this thread said that the HD 48xx series has already been found not to be useful for GPUGRID with the current ATI driver due to the way global memory is implemented. Hopefully, a future ATI driver will change that. | |
ID: 14240 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hopefully, a future ATI driver will change that. Catalyst developers have clearly said that they will not change it. Hardware speaking, it would be very difficult if not impossible. Only benefit HD4xxx will get will be from general optimizations. Memory management will always be terrible on HD4xxx | |
ID: 14243 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
The current driver hangs the machine. We reported the problem to ATI. | |
ID: 14246 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We will support only 5xxx series cards based on the new GPU chips. | |
ID: 14250 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
it's pity, but not a big deal at all. Anyway, 4870 is just a toy: I want to understand sould I stay with NV (future GTX395?) or should I move to ATI and get 5970 or even two of them. If 5970 will be not worse then future GTX395 and GPUGRID will start to support ATI most probably I'll mov to ATI, but if not - I'm staying with NV. | |
ID: 14254 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Forget GTX395 for quite a while. Fermi is so amazingly large, they just can't put two of them onto one card. Not without lowering the clocks so much that it really hurts. | |
ID: 14255 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We will support only 5xxx series cards based on the new GPU chips. So the 57xx cards will also work? What about the 4770 since it's built on the 40nm chip? Thanks! | |
ID: 14259 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
The 5xxx series saw a re-design, which in my opinion, was partially tailored to OpenCL, and the 4xxx series obviously isn't. During testing, they found that there is a significant (enough of a) penalty in the emulation of memory using global memory that made the application unfeasible. | |
ID: 14260 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
hello, | |
ID: 14264 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
@GDF | |
ID: 14268 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
You'd currently need a beta driver because the other one doesn't work (don't know if the beta one does, though) and because the development is still in beta. | |
ID: 14271 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Any cards performance is based on both the cards abilities and the application exploiting these abilities. | |
ID: 14279 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Can't give you any performance data for the RV800 hardware yet because the OpenCL SDK is still causing us problems. In short, we have a prototype application working but the driver is very unstable and often crashes the machine. We are continuing to work on it, but it seems that the ATI software needs to mature quite a bit before we can release anything. | |
ID: 14313 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Would the existing (although recently lessened) Furrier Transform memory allocation problem disappear if OpenCL was used instead of CUDA for NVidia cards? | |
ID: 14316 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hi, we are implementing our own FFT implementation for both Nvidia and ATI. | |
ID: 14323 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
ATI STATUS. | |
ID: 14324 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
hmmm... perhaps someone needs to ask the f@h guys how they do it :) | |
ID: 14417 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I doubt that they use OpenCL, probably CAL. | |
ID: 14418 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
openMM, aka gpu3, uses opencl but F@H is running into similar problems as gpugrid. two of their kernels wouldnt compile. | |
ID: 14419 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hi thare I'm receiving work's for GPu ATI. | |
ID: 14794 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
My fault. I forgot to remove the ATI app, while we are giving out the new beta app for nvidia. | |
ID: 14795 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
OK.... | |
ID: 14796 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Take a look here.. you're not going to get any work soon, as GPU-Grid doesn't want to crash your machine. | |
ID: 14808 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
it will take several months before the SDK becomes stable enough to be of practical use. maybe the situation is not so tragic in AMD... SDK v2.01 is out, with many bugs fixed and some FFT samples (if you still need them). You could retry now and maybe report new bugs found, to help development! | |
ID: 15167 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We are testing it out. | |
ID: 15178 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Please excuse my ignorance. But is GPUGRID using OpenCL or porting CUDA to OpenCL? If so, are there plans to go native with OpelCL or is ATI happy to ride around on Nvidia's horse? (BTW Kuda in Indonesian means horse, I know it's spelled with a C!)... | |
ID: 15211 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
is GPUGRID using OpenCL or porting CUDA to OpenCL? We use CUDA for our application. We are experimenting with OpenCL with a view to being able to use ATI cards, but results to date have not been encouraging. MJH | |
ID: 15212 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
but if Einstein, SETI, or Collatz Conjecture can better utilize ATI cards, ATI card owners will be tempted to go there instead. Collatz and Milkyway make excellent use of the ATIs, computationally wise. Whether you think their science is worthwhile or not is up to you ;) MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 | |
ID: 15215 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We are testing it out. any good news? does it still crash when compiling? could i suggest to release a beta app and work-units for ATi, even if performances are poor and maybe first results not really important for science? We need an OpenCL app to start the chain: opencl boinc implementation -> optimizations -> newer releases -> drivers getting better -> users more satisfied -> new science -> new apps -> optimizations and so on... Now you're in the position of being able to benefit another time gpgpu in boinc (such as when you developed the first cuda on boinc app) releasing early (and often, maybe) and breaking this stalled situation, if you have a working app (even if it's not great in performances, it will become better one day) | |
ID: 15272 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Have a read of this AMD Developer Forum thread - started by a programmer working on a BOINC project. | |
ID: 15273 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Have a read of this AMD Developer Forum thread - started by a programmer working on a BOINC project. There're some bugs, I know. And I read really often AMD developers forums, but there's not much activity going on there. I'm sure that a lot of discussions are going on behind the scenes via email, which I do not like in this stage because I think that on a forum everyone would benefit. Raistmer has many problems porting multibeam to ati because of these problems with Apple FFT opencl implementation. But this is not the whole story: not every app needs FFT, and more important everybody could write a fast fourier transform implementation on OpenCL if this one doesn't fit your needs or is broken. We couldn't ask Raistmer to do this (he is in the lunatics crew), but here there's a whole project behind... In this thread GdF (or someone of his group) said that they hadn't the possibility to implement one themselves too, but they were watching MANY implementations and that they could do some science at the beginning also without FFT-enabled app. Do not forget that MANY apps written in OpenCL are working NOW (nothing on boinc, but boinc is just a little program that close-to-no one knows). Also, I'm sure that we will have another refresh of the Stream SDK before those "few months" cited by genaganna: they said the same after SDK 2.0 but we have just had refresh 2.01 with many bug fixed. ATi is doing many efforts in their software departments (having learnt that hardware is not the only important thing) and maybe (maybe) genaganna doesn't know the whole story. On the other hand: are gpugrid project developers writing on some developers forum (Apple, nvidia, ATi) about their problems or are they using emails?? | |
ID: 15274 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hi, | |
ID: 15275 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hi, thanks a lot for sharing the app status. I was sure that also you were talking privately with ati support. ps: within 30 minutes 10.2 drivers will be out. Watch on those for your reliability tests! | |
ID: 15276 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hi, have crunched for GPUGrid before, on a 9800GTX+, which is now in use for other purposes. But I've got a rig ASUS P5E; X38; Q6600 and a ATI HD5770. | |
ID: 15321 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
GPUGrid does not currently have work for ATI but they continue to review all new developments on the SDK from ATI and spin up new betas to test things out but afaik there is nothing imminent. | |
ID: 15322 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Please excuse my ignorance. But is GPUGRID using OpenCL or porting CUDA to OpenCL? If so, are there plans to go native with OpelCL or is ATI happy to ride around on Nvidia's horse? (BTW Kuda in Indonesian means horse, I know it's spelled with a C!)... Are you aware of any software for automatically converting CUDA to OpenCL? I'm not. Are you aware of any ATI SDKs that include a reliable version of the FFT software? I'm not. Are you aware of any BOINC versions, even still in alpha test, that can use OpenCL directly instead of compiling it to CUDA or ATI's equivalent first? I'm not. How do you expect an OpenCL-only BOINC application to be produced before there is a suitable version of BOINC to test it under, or do you want one with a very high error rate even for pre-alpha testing? | |
ID: 15392 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Please excuse my ignorance. But is GPUGRID using OpenCL or porting CUDA to OpenCL? If so, are there plans to go native with OpelCL or is ATI happy to ride around on Nvidia's horse? (BTW Kuda in Indonesian means horse, I know it's spelled with a C!)... Please don't shoot me for asking a question. The reason why I asked, was because I didn't know! ;-) ____________ | |
ID: 15393 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Liveonc, Please excuse my ignorance. But is GPUGRID using OpenCL or porting CUDA to OpenCL? The current GPUGRID application, ACEMD, is written using CUDA and is therefore limited to Nvidia cards. OpenCL has many similarities with CUDA and so we have been able to port a test version of ACEMD to run on ATI hardware. One of our aims is to have a single application code-base which we can compile for either CUDA or OpenCL, in order to keep the development effort manageable, and we've almost finished the work on this. There are many practical issues that must be dealt with before we'll be in a position to release an ATI application, and these are broadly as follows: 1) application performance: the current performance on ATI is too poor to be of use to us (an HD5870 performs about as well as a GT8800). On paper the ATI hardware should perform very well so we are confident that we can improve matters with additional development work. 2) OpenCL runtime issues: ATI's OpenCL implementation lacks a few features that we need for good performance. Also, it is currently quite unstable and our development machine frequently crashes. We expect these problems to get fixed in time by ATI. 3) Testing: Once we have a feature-complete OpenCL/ATI application we need to rigorously test it to check that it gives correct results before we let it out into the wild. Ensuring we don't waste your kindly-dontated cycles carelessly is a responsibility we take seriously! We know you're all keen to get your ATI crunching, and I'll keep you informed about our progress. MJH | |
ID: 15395 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Please don't shoot me for asking a question. The reason why I asked, was because I didn't know! ;-) I didn't intend to shoot you, but perhaps I was too forceful in answering your question. | |
ID: 15396 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Please don't shoot me for asking a question. The reason why I asked, was because I didn't know! ;-) I uderstand that I used a punn, in my original question. The intention was good, a punn, is what I feel to be a humorous slap in the face with (if taken positively), can be a motivation for people to proove me dead wrong. Ati has a range of products sold for a price that makes even hard core Nvidia fans want to cry (including myself). I just hoped that if Ati go for the kill, that Nvidia also will answer back (in a positive way), by doing something about it. In the end, consumers are the winners, unless Nvidia or Ati dies... ____________ | |
ID: 15409 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Well, they did: they greatly over-built Fermi for a not-so-good 40 nm process. They desperately wanted to become the clear number 1 again, but currently it looks more like "one bird in the hand would have been better than two on the roof". See the separate thread on Fermi.. but don't get too discouraged yet. Personally I'm still convinced they're not totally stupid ;) | |
ID: 15412 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
If a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, NVidia are releasing two cards, the GTX 480 and GTX 470, costing $679.99 and $479.99, how much is the bush worth? | |
ID: 15434 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
ATI Stream Software Development Kit (SDK) v2.01 - more details. | |
ID: 15441 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Both cards have gone walk about, so its $1159.98! | |
ID: 15443 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Going with ATI Stream would mean they'd definitely have to maintain and optimize 2 separate code bases. That's something one wants to avoid if possible at all. Sure, it could end up the same way with Open CL - but at least there's a chance here for a unified code base. | |
ID: 15445 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Does GPUGRID compete with, or cooperate with folding@home? The don't use BOINC, they've got their own client. But can anything be ported? I've noticed that they support much more hardware then GPUGRID, but I don't know how good they utilize the hardware they support. | |
ID: 15615 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
If their points system is anything to go by, their ability to optimise tasks/applications/GPUs is limited, very limited. | |
ID: 15624 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
can i do the work on my laptop | |
ID: 15632 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
http://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=1458&nowrap=true#14324 | |
ID: 15637 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
http://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=1458&nowrap=true#14324 better this one: http://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=1458&nowrap=true#15275 | |
ID: 15659 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
So an update on ATI. Their SDK is still very much capable of hanging the entire machine in Windows and Linux. | |
ID: 15847 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Anything new on the ATI Application ??? | |
ID: 16430 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Still testing unstable SDKs. | |
ID: 16437 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Update on ATI. | |
ID: 16514 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Update on ATI. Thank you for the update. Sadly for GPU Grid I have been slowly migrating to ATI cards because of their higher performance on all of the other main GPU projects with lower cost in purchase and in electrical power, which is why I have been falling in the stats of late. Here is hoping we can see a better environment soon so that we can continue to contribute regardless of configuration. | |
ID: 16522 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I think that we understood in a small test code what is the problem and why we did not get the performance. If we can replicate the fix to ACEMD and it works there as well, then there could be some very good news. | |
ID: 16611 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I think that we understood in a small test code what is the problem and why we did not get the performance. If we can replicate the fix to ACEMD and it works there as well, then there could be some very good news. The best news I have had in, like, forever ... Especially when I am on the verge of having 3 each HD5870 cards ... :) If I recall correctly, GPU Grid will never be able to be run on less ... anyway ... I look forward to more ... | |
ID: 16617 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Good news :) | |
ID: 16621 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Good news :) Seti & Primegrid not fully optimized ;) | |
ID: 16623 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Seti & Primegrid not fully optimized ;) SaH is a new application in testing, the last I checked the PG is not even in a beta test, it has only been tested in stand alone modes... even the one CUDA application has been retired because the sub-project is over. As of a couple a days ago there was no GPU application on PG in use ... | |
ID: 16625 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Well, Mr. Project Guy ... one more Nvidia pulled and replaced with ATI card ... puts my project standing in dire straits sadly ... but ... I have to cut my power and increase my throughput and this is the cheapest way for me to get from here to there ... | |
ID: 16724 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
A big Plus, i'd say! | |
ID: 16725 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
A big Plus, i'd say! Been running not quite 24 hours ... going to take a couple of days to see a difference in stats I know ... and with the "pulsing" in the numbers it is hard to know where you are till you get at least a weeks data or better a month ... then you can average it out ... today's update had me at 705K for the day, not bad, but less than yesterday's 720, or the day before's 790 ... My pending on Collatz is at an all time high though ... so ... that is good ... making money on DNETC and they seem to be making small changes over the batches so maybe we can close in on the problems they are seeing there ... I have been getting errors and hard to know why, asked for more logging and hours later I have a bunch of results with nice logs ... Not sure if it is going to help with the "hang" problem though, if the task hangs and gets aborted if they just opened the log once it might be still open when the kill comes in and the log data will be lost ... if they do an open, append, close for each statement we might get some where ... though I saw a synch line in there that worries me ... it waits for the GPUs to end ... what if the GPU does not know it has ended, or sent the signal already? | |
ID: 16735 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
ATi OpenCL Stream SDK 2.1 is out now. Maybe it helps you with some bugfixing! | |
ID: 16769 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Thanks, in this version, there could be the first working application. | |
ID: 16771 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Which of the ATI cards are being used for development ? | |
ID: 16772 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
One ATI HD5850 and a HD5670. | |
ID: 16773 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Okie Doke - Many Thanks | |
ID: 16776 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
One ATI HD5850 and a HD5670. Ugh, I would expect based on other projects that those numbers would be more like reversed ... :( Still, as you note, still room for improvement... Looking forward to being able to try it ... I seem to be down to only one card on GPU Grid in that I put the GTX295 card back into rotation but all the tasks seem to be failing ... :( So, down to only one GTX280 card ... which on DNETC, Collatz and MW is considerably slower than the HD5870s which are my current backbone... | |
ID: 16788 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hi I have a Win 7 64bit computer with Radeon 5870. I would like to help if it is needed. | |
ID: 16833 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Ugh, I would expect based on other projects that those numbers would be more like reversed ... :( Just don't forget that ATIs 5-wide execution units give you more raw compute horse power per transistor, but are also harder to use efficiently. So you can't expect ATI to be faster for every algorithm.. otherwise nVidias design would be really stupid ;) MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 | |
ID: 16913 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
... :) | |
ID: 16915 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
The SDK2.1 is better but still has several bugs in parts which are required to run the code reliably. We must wait for the next release. | |
ID: 16959 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
The SDK2.1 is better but still has several bugs in parts which are required to run the code reliably. We must wait for the next release. Thats is good news once again ... and if they are helping, maybe they will see first hand the problems with the SDK and that will improve the chances that that will be fixed as well ... Thanks for the update ... | |
ID: 16960 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
In the meanwhile we are working on the performance with the help of AMD. Very good news. Thanks! | |
ID: 16962 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
The SDK2.1 is better but still has several bugs in parts which are required to run the code reliably. We must wait for the next release. New here with a 5870 open for testing if required. Awesome to read of the work going on here by everyone involved, and the help from AMD! | |
ID: 16977 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Great news, indeed! If you haven't done already, tell AMD that their help and hardware are greatly appreaciated in the world of BOINC :) | |
ID: 16996 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Great news, indeed! If you haven't done already, tell AMD that their help and hardware are greatly appreaciated in the world of BOINC :) Even better point out that the more projects that run ATI applications that work decently, the more cards they will sell to this small, but intense market ... I know I am solidly in the ATI camp and am down to my last couple of Nvidia cards as we type/read ... and if they stay ahead of Nvidia will stay ATI for some time ... I can see that some of the bigger ranchers have 20-30 systems and they tend to stick with the same cards if they can find one that works well ... We are not a big as the gamers segment (yet), but 300,000 users world wide is not a trivial market to ignore either ... | |
ID: 16997 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I second ETAs comment. I also became a recent convert, after 15 years with NVidia ever since NVidia started on the consumer end of things. The ATI performance on the non BOINC tasks I do has been amazing, it far outweighs expectation let alone hard comparative performance figures. On the BOINC ATI Projects I am now running, it flys .... | |
ID: 17014 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
poorboy...I sure hope you get this going soon as Collatz & Milkyway are Complete Flops a lot of times like right now. Most of my ATI Cards are just sitting Idle & have been for quite awhile now because Collatz & Milkyway are down and may be down for ??? Really? Why is that? | |
ID: 17016 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
poorboy...I sure hope you get this going soon as Collatz & Milkyway are Complete Flops a lot of times like right now. Most of my ATI Cards are just sitting Idle & have been for quite awhile now because Collatz & Milkyway are down and may be down for ??? Their my Box's and I choose to Support the BOINC Projects only, that's enough reason for me ... :) ____________ STE\/E | |
ID: 17046 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Reason enough for sure. they'll sit Idle before I run Folding@home ... Folding seems like a worthwhile project to me so I was wondering if you had a bad experience or something? | |
ID: 17081 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
just out of curiosity have you tested your openCL code on a CPU yet? AMD's opencl cpu compiler should be more mature and less buggy than their gpu compiler. it would also be a nice performance reference. | |
ID: 17146 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Reason enough for sure. No, I've never had any dealings with Folding & from reading about it I'm sure it's a worthwhile project. But BOINC was what got me started (SETI Classic) & BOINC is what I will stay with. If Folding ever came under the BOINC Umbrella I would run it but until it does I won't a long as there are BOINC Projects around to run ... ____________ STE\/E | |
ID: 17196 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I think Folding@home is a good project, and I have run a few hundred tasks there. | |
ID: 17199 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Would be nice if F@H introduced a BOINC wrapper, like e.g. yoyo@home. But their entire infrastructure is probably not very compatible with BOINC and they looked into it some time ago - and found it not be stable enough (or whatever other reason). | |
ID: 17216 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I agree with the wrapper for folding, the one for dnetc looks good. The fah client is not so user friendly in comparison with boinc. I stopped folding a month ago due to the poor optimization of the ati client, and also the reluctance to give feedback to the 'new client'. I'm using my ati cards for seti and collatz (the low-level ones). | |
ID: 17225 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
It's a bit off topic, but ATI for SETI? I didn't hear about that heard yet. How's performance? | |
ID: 17230 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
It's a bit off topic, but ATI for SETI? I didn't hear about that heard yet. How's performance? Still in Beta and it is for the AP tasks only as far as I have been able to find out. Again, the preliminary reports are that it is somewhat like the EaH application in the it uses more CPU than most would like though that is supposedly falling as they have worked the code. The main coders are on Lunatics and the beta is not a full open beta yet ... | |
ID: 17235 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
It's a bit off topic, but ATI for SETI? I didn't hear about that heard yet. How's performance? The hybrid version (for 2xxx and up) yes, still using too much CPU, like the EaH. The OpenCL+Brook+ (for 4xxx and up) is using 98% GPU + ~5% CPU. | |
ID: 17240 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
In so much as PoorBoy is loyal to Boinc, others are loyal to Folding. Perhaps if Folding and Boinc colaborated in terms of recognition (points/tasks/achievements) it would be more favourable, but Folding is a very big project, with hundreds of thousands of present crunchers. I may be wrong but it seem to me at one time Folding & BOINC tried to get together but never could Iron out the Details. From what I think I remember Folding wanted everything to much their way and the Deal never went thru ... Like I said I think I remember something like that taking place in the past ... ____________ STE\/E | |
ID: 17248 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I have a 5750 ATI GPU running on linux, I would be happy to help with some testing if needed. | |
ID: 17477 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Any news on ATI cards yet? Did you get them working well? I have a couple 5970's I would like to use but... | |
ID: 17683 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Any news on ATI cards yet? Did you get them working well? I have a couple 5970's I would like to use but... Yes, I cannot wait to help this project with my ATI. | |
ID: 17685 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hmm, an update would be nice, it's been a few weeks since anything was said. | |
ID: 17703 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Rest assured that if there is no update, it's not there yet ;) | |
ID: 17706 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Is this a possible way of cutting corners to getting something to work for ATI GPU's? http://www.fixstars.com/en/solutions/opencl/compiler.html | |
ID: 17745 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We are waiting for ATI to fix their compiler and libraries. There is no much we can do. Some new tests are in progress these days. | |
ID: 17749 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Thank-you for the update. Good to read where developement is at and moving along... | |
ID: 17844 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We are waiting for ATI to fix their compiler and libraries. From this post http://oscarbg.blogspot.com/2010/07/ati-stream-sdk-roadmap.html are you going to send some beta test in aug? | |
ID: 17912 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hi, | |
ID: 17913 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
CAL is the old programming model. It is deprecated. If you have an old application it makes sense to use it still, for a new one, it's better to wait for OpenCL. Hi, | |
ID: 17914 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
If there will ever be an ATi support for GPUGrid, will double precision be required for the card? In other words, will I be able to run GPUGrid on 5770s? | |
ID: 17918 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I dont think double precision is on the cards (it is not needed now), but that does not mean that a 5770 would not work. If ATI GPUs do eventually work here, that card should be a good one. | |
ID: 17919 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hi, | |
ID: 17921 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
@MJH: may I ask why? To keep things as simple as possible initially or is there any important technical difference for GPU-Grid between e.g. HD58x0 and HD57x0? Are these apps producing wrong results? That's not the point (and is probably not the case). For GPU-Grid the problem is that using the current SDK the app is not stable. And if I understand correctly the problems have been traced down to API calls (functionality provided by ATI), so it's up to them to fix it. MrS (*) the code of CC and MW is not very complex, but certainly not trivial either ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 | |
ID: 17924 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
The 58x0 is what we work with here. A 57x0 app may follow, probably, if all goes well and they prove to be fast enough. Lower 5xxx series cards will definitely be too slow to be useful. And the 4xxx is right out. MJH | |
ID: 17928 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hi, | |
ID: 17929 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
[quote] Why? The 4850, 4870, 4890 & 4770 are generally faster than the 57xx and support DP to boot. The 57xx does not. | |
ID: 17933 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Why? The design of the R700 processor used in the 4xxx series cards prevents the complete implementation of some features of OpenCL that are of critical importance for our application. (It's yesterday's technology, sorry!) MJH | |
ID: 17934 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Why? 5xxx series has OpenCL 1.1 support. If you can get the 57xx series to work, at least you aren't going for DP :) . | |
ID: 17936 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
GPU-Grid doesn't need DP and this is hopefully not going to change anytime soon. At least one important difference between the 4000 and 5000 series is flexibility in memory management, if I understood correctly. | |
ID: 17938 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
i guess you could say that. local data share on rv770 was too restricted to meet opencl requirements. | |
ID: 17972 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
http://support.amd.com/us/kbarticles/Pages/OpenCL11ATICat107UpdateDriver.aspx | |
ID: 18264 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Does this mean that the new SDK is available and testing of the ATI-apps is going on? | |
ID: 18302 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Perhaps the scientists will have another look at ATI cards in September or October, but they have a lot to do; optimize the GTX460, and forthcoming GTX475, try to get working apps for the GTS450, GTS445 and GTS440 (due out on the 12th), as well as the GF108 cards, also due out soon. | |
ID: 18303 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Thank you for the update. | |
ID: 18310 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
ATI 2.2 fixes most serious bugs and we will probably put out a test application for ATI. The performance is still poor for several reasons. ATI on one side and us on the other, will work to make it faster. Most likely, SDK 2.3 could be a better release performance wise, now that bugs are under controls. | |
ID: 18313 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
ATI 2.2 fixes most serious bugs and we will probably put out a test application for ATI. I've set my mainsys (with two ATI-cards) to accept GPUGRID wu's. If something more to do is required, I expect instructions somwhere. Regards, Alexander | |
ID: 18315 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
ATI 2.2 fixes most serious bugs and we will probably put out a test application for ATI. The performance is still poor for several reasons. ATI on one side and us on the other, will work to make it faster. Most likely, SDK 2.3 could be a better release performance wise, now that bugs are under controls. I have a 5870..do you still plan on doing a beta release the end of summer or is it sooner? | |
ID: 18328 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
sdk 2.2 out... | |
ID: 18329 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I think the researchers are down to a skeleton team during the summer holidays; enough staff to keep the tasks flowing, but little or no development work gets done. | |
ID: 18330 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I think the researchers are down to a skeleton team during the summer holidays Yep! Can't be wearing the white coats every day of the year... MJH | |
ID: 18348 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hey. | |
ID: 18655 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Yes, | |
ID: 18724 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Thanks for the info. | |
ID: 18725 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Gosh, I came back to see if there was something new in here, but that wasn't the case :) | |
ID: 18738 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Performance of a top ati card however is 3 times slower than a fermi at the moment but at least it runs. Yay! I'll take it, back to basics. First make something work, then fine tune the process. At any rate my 5870 will accept beta work units, if/when some are issued. It's been crunching a long time now, and curious about GPUgrid. M. | |
ID: 18743 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
[quote | |
ID: 18746 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
From Paladin*: PS: As a side note Subscribing to a Thread is Pointless for me as I never receive a Notice by E-Mail even though I have my Preferences set to do so ... ??? Some of the ISPs in Germany are using a rather obsolete list of which other ISPs to block email access to - for example, it includes mine, whose outsourced newsgroups server USED to be a common posting point for newsgroups spam. In the years since then, it brought the newsgroups server in house with a newsgroups person more active in controlling spam, then was acquired by another ISP and dropped newsgroups entirely. You may want to check if whatever ISP you have your email account on is on one of those obsolete lists. | |
ID: 18751 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
From skgiven: I think Folding just does protein folding, so it is different to this project; GPUGrid is unique in that it looks at super-structures (complexes of large molecules, such as lipid bylayer spanning pore proteins). Folding is more akin to Foldit in its research. For those interested in protein research: Poem@Home is starting testing of GPU versions of their program, for both Nvidia and ATI cards. Name is POEM++; current version is 0.01. | |
ID: 18752 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
For those interested in protein research: Poem@Home is starting testing of GPU versions of their program, for both Nvidia and ATI cards. Name is POEM++; current version is 0.01. Poem@Home currently only has POEM++ CPU clients out. Once they are convinced that these are stable they will start rolling out the GPU clients. Current estimate is that this will happen in a month or so. | |
ID: 18785 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Any progres? | |
ID: 18953 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Yes, the level of stability is still not sufficient for the use in GPUGRID. | |
ID: 18964 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Good News :) | |
ID: 18973 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
An idea on how to produce a GPUGRID version for the AMD/ATI HD4nnn family, once you get suitable software support: | |
ID: 19001 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Sorry for asking again, but are you going to reguire single or double precision for ATI client? | |
ID: 19004 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I dont know of any reason to require double precision for here, so only single precision would be required. | |
ID: 19008 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I dont know of any reason to require double precision for here, so only single precision would be required. Agreed. Otherwise almost none of the nVidias would work here, or would have trouble keeping up with CPUs :p MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 | |
ID: 19012 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
what's up? | |
ID: 19016 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
what's up? Sit back, relax and don't expect anything too soon. MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 | |
ID: 19019 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
The 2.2 SDK is still a bit too ropey. We're deferring any public app until 2.3 is available. | |
ID: 19032 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Have AMD given any kind of Indicative timeframe for 2.3? They'll never give a date, thats for sure, but they do at times give a vague Q1/Q2 etc kind of response. | |
ID: 19073 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
it should be before the end of the year I guess. | |
ID: 19074 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
ID: 19075 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Also, we want to see what's new in the 69xx series... | |
ID: 19083 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
/me 2 | |
ID: 19091 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Some month back, a few people from the Lunatics Crew, made several app.'s | |
ID: 19155 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
If you set the environment variable SWAN_SYNC=0, in most tasks the use is around 97% in GTX480 in GPUGRID. Some month back, a few people from the Lunatics Crew, made several app.'s | |
ID: 19158 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
If you set the environment variable SWAN_SYNC=0, in most tasks the use is around 97% in GTX480 in GPUGRID. A command line parameter? I'm not very skilled in programming. More hardware. (Old fashioned tubes(!)/transistor/mosFET/(Amstrad CPC128, first PC, BASIC & CPM1.1)(Nice) But one is never too old to learn :) Where do I put this? BOINC (Program)dir? ____________ Knight Who Says Ni N! | |
ID: 19201 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
ID: 19202 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
For me, SWAN_SYNC increases GPU usage from 62% or so to 67% (Win 7 64 bit) | |
ID: 19405 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
For me, SWAN_SYNC increases GPU usage from 62% or so to 67% (Win 7 64 bit) The problem is Windows 7. Xp and Linux give the best performance. gdf | |
ID: 19406 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I'm pleased to announce that www.boinc.Drugdiscovery@home.com now has a working beta of a ati_opencl of MDRUN, it has been tested on a 5700 ati, a 2600 xt, as well the developers computer. | |
ID: 19466 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I'm pleased to announce that www.boinc.Drugdiscovery@home.com now has a working beta of a ati_opencl of MDRUN, it has been tested on a 5700 ati, a 2600 xt, as well the developers computer. Are you sure opencl is running on 2600? How long are the WUs on the 2600? | |
ID: 19468 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
yes, i'm sure it's running on the 2600 xt... it's my computer... | |
ID: 19470 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Looks like they are just testing, and have no work at the minute. | |
ID: 19471 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
yes, i'm sure it's running on the 2600 xt... it's my computer... If you go here, https://simtk.org/project/xml/downloads.xml?group_id=161 it will redirect to amd gpu page, which has support for opencl only gor 4xxx and up. On the 2600 card, is it going to take around 20h for the WU described? | |
ID: 19473 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
yes, i'm sure it's running on the 2600 xt... it's my computer... I know, i'm not the developer, if he made it compatible with older cards, then so be it, progress.... you should be congratulating us instead of criticizing it... ati may only support 4300 and up but we know the true reason for that.... ( They want to MAKE MONEY ON THE CARDS!!!!!) but the truth it is opencl is compatible with the 2600 xt, my card running it proves it... We know that our research, will take sometime... that's why we've been wanting to go to gpu apps as they are much faster than the single cpu... and well have cuda to go along with ati. | |
ID: 19475 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
hello, me again!!!! | |
ID: 19480 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I guess it was running on the CPU instead? | |
ID: 19483 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
but on jack computer it runs on the ati card... | |
ID: 19488 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Sorry, I have no idea what you're talking about. I don't know who Jack is. | |
ID: 19533 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
yea you kinda got that right.... Jack is the Main admin on the DD@H and the Developer of Hydrogen.... | |
ID: 19574 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I have accept Beta work and it comes no Work | |
ID: 19860 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
There are no tasks for ATI cards, and as far as I am aware no immediate plans to use ATI cards. | |
ID: 19868 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We are waiting for SDK2.3. | |
ID: 19871 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
If you have a new 5870 ATI GPUs please accept beta work from us, in the following days we will try to upload a new ATI application. Hi, I am still waiting. Can I hope to get the bata in this year? woever | |
ID: 19876 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
ATI's roadmap suggests they will release SDK2.3 this month. | |
ID: 19877 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
well....hmmm..it's out :) | |
ID: 19888 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
well....hmmm..it's out :) It's out? developer.amd.com has still 2.2 ready for download. Anyway, maybe we get a christmas present ... | |
ID: 19892 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
SDK2.3 is in the new Driver Pack 10.12 | |
ID: 19897 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Looks like 10.2 turned up yesterday (13th Dec). | |
ID: 19907 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
No, | |
ID: 19908 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Yeah SDK 2.3 has been released. | |
ID: 19911 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
http://www.semiaccurate.com/2010/12/14/look-amds-new-cayman6900-architecture/ | |
ID: 19929 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I especially like the new feature "asynchronous dispatch". It lets different apps be executed on the GPU at the same time. Fermi only allows different kernels from the same app. This could help with GPU utilisation, if the problem is using more Multiprocessors, or if the GPU is not used all the time. And it could make crunching GPUs more responsive, which is always welcome. Might even help with the CPU support / synchronization issues we're seeing at GPU-Grid now. By that I mean the CPU is not acting fast enough to keep the GPU busy - which would be much easier if the GPU was working on 2 WUs concurrently and with half a step phase difference. That way there'd be a rather large buffer or time window until the next CPU support would be required. | |
ID: 19984 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I especially like the new feature "asynchronous dispatch". It lets different apps be executed on the GPU at the same time. Fermi only allows different kernels from the same app. This could help with GPU utilisation, if the problem is using more Multiprocessors, or if the GPU is not used all the time. And it could make crunching GPUs more responsive, which is always welcome. Might even help with the CPU support / synchronization issues we're seeing at GPU-Grid now. By that I mean the CPU is not acting fast enough to keep the GPU busy - which would be much easier if the GPU was working on 2 WUs concurrently and with half a step phase difference. That way there'd be a rather large buffer or time window until the next CPU support would be required. WOW, that feature alone is peaking my interest in GPU coding. I imagine this a result of AMD's Fusion direction. More reading to do... M. | |
ID: 19995 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
From Extra Terrestrial Apes: | |
ID: 20009 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Boinc Projects are going to want to facilitate Open-CL: | |
ID: 20012 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
So the beta for ATi cards is expected some time within January? | |
ID: 20067 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Anny news for beta for ATi cards ? | |
ID: 20119 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
excuse me if this has already been answered. Or if I should know better. But, i need a bit of help here. | |
ID: 20122 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
then again to V8.8 when I installed what they call, "Catalyst Control". Is that the only graphic card in your PC or is there also an on-board card? AMD (unlike nVidia) needs a monitor plugged in (or a dummy-plug) to be detected by BOINC. | |
ID: 20134 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Boudicca, ATI cards do not presently work on this project (GPUGrid), hence the message, "No usable GPU's found". | |
ID: 20137 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Boudicca, | |
ID: 20145 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Boudicca, | |
ID: 20167 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
SDK 2.3 is out, some news about AMD app? | |
ID: 20181 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
There has been continuous speculation as to when ATI cards would be facilitated by this project. While another SDK has been released and the programmers might be working on this or at least planning to, it would be wise to accept that so far there have been lots of disappointments and false dawns. I don’t want to get anyone’s hope up on the ATI front because of this, but I also understand some of the hardware requirements might not be in place to support such an addition to the project. Also note that if ATI cards are supported at some stage, the initial phase of their introduction would be bumpy with lots of testing, problems and periods of inactivity. So don’t think someone can just flick a switch and suddenly GPUGrid will support ATI cards. | |
ID: 20182 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
SDK2.3 is still unstable unfortunately. I am getting a bit tired of this level of software support from ATI. | |
ID: 20197 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
SDK2.3 is still unstable unfortunately. I am getting a bit tired of this level of software support from ATI. could you please share the problems you found with the community? I think that many of us would like to read something about the problems you are finding and how you're tackling them. May I also say that maybe some problems rely on your side? I'm reading many positive comments about SDK 2.2 and 2.3... Surely a lot of work is still required for optimization, but an app should be working by now! | |
ID: 20203 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I’m not in the least surprised to hear that ATI support is insufficient, and I seriously doubt the merits of perusing an ATI application suitable to the complexities of this projects research. I suggest you concentrate on CUDA for the foreseeable future; I know of several aspects to the present CUDA apps that could do with your attention (I spoke too soon, being addressed here). If an ATI app is not going to happen, put it to rest and let it be. Some projects have spent over a year trying to test and develop ATI apps only to find it is impossible/worthless. | |
ID: 20204 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
to let the AMD-app die, is not a good choice! | |
ID: 20207 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I’m not in the least surprised to hear that ATI support is insufficient, and I seriously doubt the merits of perusing an ATI application suitable to the complexities of this projects research. [..] Some projects have spent over a year trying to test and develop ATI apps only to find it is impossible/worthless. Looks like a real fan-boy speaking... Is ATI only a mathematical GPU??? By the way: Why not using external support? there are excellent examples in the history of grid-computing: Akatosh: Einstein@Home ClusterPhysik(Gipsel): Milkyway/Collatz | |
ID: 20213 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Looks like a real fan-boy speaking... I expect you came to that conclusion by reading one post. Is ATI only a mathematical GPU??? You answered yourself, Akatosh: Einstein@Home By the way: Why not using external support? there are excellent examples in the history of grid-computing Funds and expert ATI OpenCL programmers familiar with molecular dynamics don’t grow on trees. Might have been an excellent example if it came with a link, but I doubt it; MW, Collatz and Einstein dont run molecular dynamic simulations, their apps are more simplistic and very different. | |
ID: 20214 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We have done our bit, it's just them that have to produce a working SDK. We have filed so many bug reports in the process. | |
ID: 20216 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
MW, Collatz and Einstein dont run molecular dynamic simulations, their apps are more simplistic and very different. Yes of course, you are right. But one word to MW/Collatz: both projects have Cuda and ATI apps. They are simpler for both types, nVidia AND Ati, but both apps are faster on ATI and use much less power also. So don't let the ATI-apps die! | |
ID: 20217 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
It’s easier to write simple apps and if ATI doesn’t adequately support the creation of more complex apps then its better to wait for the next SDK than to continue to debug and report endless errors, knowing that they will not be fixed until the next SDK, if at all. | |
ID: 20219 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
It’s easier to write simple apps and if ATI doesn’t adequately support the creation of more complex apps then its better to wait for the next SDK than to continue to debug and report endless errors, knowing that they will not be fixed until the next SDK, if at all. http://dnahome.cs.rpi.edu/dna/ This project is in an very early stage and I can not say for shure, that it is as complex as GPUGRID, I'm no scientist. And until now there is no GPU-app, but moderators say they plan to do that. Another thing: as far as I understood, OpenCL is a hardware independent programming language. Since GDF did some tests with an openCL app and it looks like he has an ready to go app (a lot of effort has been put it to get there with large structural changes), he could release that as an nVidia-app. This gives the possibility to test the app in the field und to compare speeds, at least again the cuda-app. This could also solve some problems with the apps for fermi only and non-fermi apps. MW did that; the openCL and the cuda-apps take exact the same time to complete (only a few seconds apart for a 17min task). Please do not misinterprete my words, I really don't want to bother anyone. Your efford to develop the project is appreciated. It's my interest for this project that leds me to encourage you to distribute an ATI-app, even if it is unstable. I will not post angry words. | |
ID: 20221 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
@skgiven: I apologize for my misinterpretational words. I wrote it "it looks like..." not "there is ...". | |
ID: 20225 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
You have spent a lot of time crunching mathematical projects such as DNETC, PrimeGrid, and Collatz, but not so much for the more humanitarian projects. Do you put your Cypres to use at Folding@home? Perhaps you should have thought through your choice of GPU a bit better before purchasing it and limiting yourself to mathematical analyses. | |
ID: 20227 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
If one can accuse SK of being a fan then it would be a GPU-Grid fan ;) | |
ID: 20228 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
So... Delayed until after SDK 2.4 is released? | |
ID: 20283 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Yesterday Lunatics released their first ATI-OpenCL App for SETI (Multibeam). | |
ID: 20284 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
+1 | |
ID: 20285 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
GDF said that the problem was numerous bugs in the present SDK package. We know speed is not great but getting a working app is the main problem. Perhaps they will do better using Windows with the present SDK, but I am not holding up much hope. If not then we will have to wait for SDK 2.4, and testing will basically start over again. | |
ID: 20286 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
If not then we will have to wait for SDK 2.4, and testing will basically start over again. When should the new SDK be available? | |
ID: 20288 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I cant find a future AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing SDK (APP SDK) , but my guess is SDK2.4 will be released in mid of April: | |
ID: 20294 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
It's now the middle of February and nothing? | |
ID: 20428 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Given the expected ETA's of the next two APP SDK's and some knowledge of the researchers timetable, I don't expect another sustained attempt until around Aug. | |
ID: 20432 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
That's sad to hear. :( | |
ID: 20440 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
That is good news. I hope it goes well. | |
ID: 20448 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
It's now the middle of February and nothing? Myself included, I am going to upgrade back to an nvidia GPU soon, but still would like to beta test an ATI app | |
ID: 20449 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Oh, will check back here in 6 months and see then... | |
ID: 20450 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Stanford just released their OpenCL client for ATi (OpenCL 1.1, so only Radeon HD5xxx and 6xxx cards, older cards are being abandoned by that project), based on their opensource toolkit OpenMM. They seems to be happy with SDK 2.3, and a lot more for the speed improvements in 2.4 (in beta/RC now, with the latest 11.3/11.4 drivers). | |
ID: 20835 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
GDF said before that it's crashing a lot. I don't know anything else, though. | |
ID: 20844 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I have running DNETC on 5870 and ist runninmg fine. I chaned yesterday tu 11.3 and it is a little quicker. | |
ID: 20845 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
The quality of any OpenCL implementation is simply poor so far. At every new version one bug is fixed and two new appear. For us, it was just a big loss of time, but we will be here for AMD when they are ready. | |
ID: 20851 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
SDK 2.4 was released a few days ago. | |
ID: 20898 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Yeeee, sure :P | |
ID: 20906 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Yeeee, sure :P Ale dlaczego? Czy uważasz, że punkty PrimeGrid są ważniejsze niż punkty GPUGRID? Chodź tutaj. en. But why? Do you think that the PrimeGrid points are more important than GPUGRID points? Come here. | |
ID: 20910 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Nie wartościuje punktów ani projektów. Każdy projekt jest wartościowy, każde punkty cieszą. Liczę sobie tutaj, liczę sobie tam - dobrze się bawię i pozdrawiam wszystkich :D | |
ID: 20941 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hello everyone, | |
ID: 20961 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
On ATI development, I don't hold up much hope for the immediate future, The quality of any OpenCL implementation is simply poor so far. At every new version one bug is fixed and two new appear. For us, it was just a big loss of time, but we will be here for AMD when they are ready. On language, My advice is to post in English if you can. If your English is not great, post in your preferred language as well; a bad English translation is unlikely to get a response, but if you also use your preferred language someone will probably be able to speak it or make a better translation. You can use Google Translate, to get a reasonable translation. Using simplified language helps. I have no objections to a few friendly words in any language, but if anyone is going to ramble on use the Personal Messaging facility. If you see a post in a language you don't understand, it's probably small talk, otherwise they would probably have posted in English. | |
ID: 20995 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
11.7 has amd app sdk 2.5 Is it any good or not? | |
ID: 21791 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
we will be looking again at AMD only after the summer and will post comments here. | |
ID: 21816 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
11.7 has amd app sdk 2.5 Is it any good or not? In the meantime 11.8 is released. Makes heavy use of the CPU as well. | |
ID: 21869 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
11.7 has amd app sdk 2.5 Is it any good or not? What makes heavy use of the CPU? | |
ID: 21881 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
there's a bug in the latest sdk that makes a full use of a cpu-core whenever an opencl app is running. | |
ID: 21965 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We have a more or less advanced stage application for AMD. Performance could be better, but at least it seems to run stably in a local machine. We might have a release of an alpha-app in the next couple of months. | |
ID: 22144 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
People have been waiting for over 2 years for an AMD application. Some of us are willing to test even nightly builds asap. | |
ID: 22149 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
... Performance could be better... Could you please specify this? | |
ID: 22150 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
H5850 is about 4 times slower than the top card a gtx580. | |
ID: 22152 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
It is also four times cheaper. | |
ID: 22153 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
It is also four times cheaper. LOL! Excellent point! ____________ - da shu @ HeliOS, "A child's exposure to technology should never be predicated on an ability to afford it." | |
ID: 22156 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
It is also four times cheaper. And *only* consumes half the power.. MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 | |
ID: 22159 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We are practically ready with the app alone. We have to test it on the context of boinc now. | |
ID: 22161 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
The new amd app will require OpenCL 1.1 and double precision cards? | |
ID: 22162 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Is it possible to update the server for OpenCL without the *new credit* code? | |
ID: 22163 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
The new amd app will require OpenCL 1.1 and double precision cards? The nVidia code doesn't require dp, so there's no reason why the ATI code would. Can't tell you the OpenCL version, though. MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 | |
ID: 22165 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
opencl 1.1 and jut single precision required. | |
ID: 22166 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
opencl 1.1 and jut single precision required. ...it's time to burn some fusion chips From my point of view, it doesn't matter if the gpu load is going to be 20-25%, I think my laptops are going to handle it | |
ID: 22167 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
gpu load is around 85% | |
ID: 22169 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
gpu load is around 85% any rough estimate for alpha testing?...like next week? :) | |
ID: 22170 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
...it's time to burn some fusion chips The current Fursions are HD6000 series, so they should work :) (don't expect performance miracles, though) MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 | |
ID: 22171 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
gpu load is around 85% More like next month. gdf | |
ID: 22177 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
gpu load is around 85% Ok. Now is 1.10.2011. What you waiting for? | |
ID: 22197 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
What you waiting for? Maybe for the app being ready for public alpha testing? MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 | |
ID: 22202 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We are waiting to have time... We are submitting 2 new papers and two new applications for grants. | |
ID: 22204 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Any news on the AMD application? | |
ID: 22474 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I have two AMD GPUs I would love to use on this project! I hope you can get it out soon! | |
ID: 22479 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I am also interested by the future support for ATI / AMD, but I hope it will be stable and the performance will be a good level ? | |
ID: 22517 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
It's hard to compare performances between different projects, especially Boinc to non-Boinc. However I would still expect a high end AMD GPU (HD6900) to significantly outperform a high end CPU (i7-2600), which is not the case at folding. | |
ID: 22518 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
AMDs current VLIW architecture is much harder to utilize efficiently than nVidias scalar shaders. That's likely why they've got these problems at F@H and why they're not yet rocking GPU-Grid. Sure, software is also a very important piece of the puzzle.. and AMDs compiler has a harder job keeping these execution units fed. But it's not always possible to work around fundamently architecture limitation by software - so it's not only about software maturity and "trying hard enough". | |
ID: 22519 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Yes I think that the performance gap between AMD and Nvidia should be large enough. | |
ID: 22520 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Cayman may only be 20% faster than a 5850 per clock, but there are some monsters compared to a humble 5850. For example, you beast cuts through MW tasks in around a minute, while an HD5850 takes about three times as long. I'm not saying AMD's will be great, but some people might want to use their AMD GPU here. | |
ID: 22521 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Definitely worth it. For many GPU-Grid would be the first worthwhile project to run on AMDs :) | |
ID: 22525 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We agree that it's worth testing, and would be a worthwhile project.
| |
ID: 22531 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
No, that 20% comes from the fact that Cayman has 24 shader clusters compared 20 in a full Cypress. On the HD5850 2 of them are deactivated. That's where the first factor 24/18 comes from ;) | |
ID: 22535 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
You lost me at 20% faster per clock and 24/18 is 33%... | |
ID: 22536 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
me wrote: 20% at best .. that's for a full Cypress (24/20), which the HD5850 is not ;) MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 | |
ID: 22539 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
What can I say after two years of waiting to be able to count on ATI ... | |
ID: 22578 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Right, TomaszPawel, 'this calls for immediate discussion', this seems to be all that is happening on the ATI/AMD front... | |
ID: 22579 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
There is an app, and it will be beta tested when the scientists are in the position to do so, and have the time. The scientists built, tested (as well as previous unusable apps) and reported what they observed in this thread. Server upgrades and site improvements are presently being tested/developed. These are required for the project as a whole, and to facilitate the introduction and maintenance of an AMD app. When these are finished and implemented the scientists can then begin work on preparing to release an AMD Beta app. | |
ID: 22581 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Either give your volunteers a definitive date when there will be an app, and I mean definitive, or a definitive statement 'There will never be an ATI/AMD OpenCL app for the following reasons'! But please not this "sitting between two chairs" any longer! Please tell me you're joking. I'm not trying to start an argument here, but I really hope that you - a VOLUNTEER - are not making demands of the GPUGRID scientists & staff. They have limited resources, and we as volunteers are here to support them, not the other way around. Look, if you've got some AMD cards lying around, I can appreciate you wanting to put them to work on this project. But IMO we should all remember our role as volunteers. The AMD app will get here when it gets here. Or not. Getting in a twist and griping because your expectations aren't being met is counter-productive. Maybe I've misinterpreted your post...if so, I apologize in advance. Cheers! | |
ID: 22583 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We would like to get some alpha app for ati/amd out by the end of the year. However, we don't know if it will good enough to go in production. The update of the server has required a very large amount of work so far. | |
ID: 22584 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Either give your volunteers a definitive date when there will be an app, and I mean definitive, or a definitive statement 'There will never be an ATI/AMD OpenCL app for the following reasons'! But please not this "sitting between two chairs" any longer! No, SMTB1963, I am not joking, but I have not 'demanded' anything as well. I said 'please' as you see in the second phrase of your quoted text of mine. :) Yes, you are right, we are the volunteers, but we are also the volunteers! :) We support science and the scientists more or less personally with volunteering a lot of money for hardware and power. In some cases this munificence makes the science possible in the first place, and I think this is one of these cases. I do not see myself as a 'Megacruncher', if that is a part of my statement that should have been misunderstood. But I know a lot of guys in my team and elsewhere, that could be interested in unleashing a lot of power AMD-wise (and CUDA-wise) on this project. And it is my point of view that all volunteers deserve to be kept up to date on the progress of such undertakings on a regular basis by an official. With this kind of answer of GDF and others: We would like to get some alpha app for ati/amd out by the end of the year. However, we don't know if it will good enough to go in production. The update of the server has required a very large amount of work so far. I am satisfied, because it contains all the official information I waited for. First, there is an app in alpha development status, second, it could (and perhaps will) be buggy, third, the reasons that hindered the progress... Thank you to all officials and I look forward to help (alpha- or beta-)testing the app and will continue waiting with fingers crossed. Please continue keeping us up to date whenever you can find the time! Cheers and sorry again, if my chose of words in English was misunderstanding, as I am German and not a native speaker! ____________ | |
ID: 22588 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Seems like things have calmed down again, but I'll add some more cents anyway: Kirk: Scotty, how much time do you need? and there's always something unexpected crossing your way. The question is just how severe that is and how much effort it takes to get around it. Personally I wouldn't dare committing to a release date for a highly experimental piece of software. Well, one could release a half baked alpha in time.. but that wouldn't please people either. And people tend to be impatient and tend to hear what they want to hear. So "we hope to get an alpha out by x" quickly turns into "Woow, there'll be an app by x!". Which is quite different.. MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 | |
ID: 22591 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Seems like things have calmed down again, but I'll add some more cents anyway: My Genealogy software did exactly that, they gave a hoped for release date and then caught holy he!! for missing it. They came on and gave the reasons for the delay and it did not help!! They now say it will be relased when it is ready and not before, they still catch some flak but not nearly as much!! | |
ID: 22599 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
For people outside research it's sometimes difficult to imagine how it works... [beamed Kirk & Scotty out of quote] ...there's always something unexpected crossing your way. The question is just how severe that is and how much effort it takes to get around it. Personally I wouldn't dare committing to a release date for a highly experimental piece of software. Well, one could release a half baked alpha in time.. but that wouldn't please people either. Hmmm, This sounds a lot like software development at work. Oh, wait, this IS software development! Just not at work. ;-) LOL ____________ - da shu @ HeliOS, "A child's exposure to technology should never be predicated on an ability to afford it." | |
ID: 22601 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Oh, wait, this IS software development! Just not at work. ;-) LOL Not your work :D MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 | |
ID: 22610 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
ROFLMAO... Excellent point!Oh, wait, this IS software development! Just not at work. ;-) LOL ____________ - da shu @ HeliOS, "A child's exposure to technology should never be predicated on an ability to afford it." | |
ID: 22612 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
HI, | |
ID: 22733 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
HI, In an older post you said that the amd app should support OpenCL 1.0, meaning 4xxx series and up. Are you trying to say that the 2 previous architectures will be abandoned? | |
ID: 22734 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We don't know yet, but we will start testing on GCN cards and initially support those. I am expecting enough problems already with a single compiler generation. | |
ID: 22735 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We don't know yet, but we will start testing on GCN cards and initially support those. I am expecting enough problems already with a single compiler generation. If this is the best answer after 2 years of waiting, to support an architecture that it's not even out yet, then ... good luck with all that | |
ID: 22736 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Performance of alpha versions has been pretty lacking compared to what's possible on nVidia hardware. Folding@Home is facing a similar problem. The current ATIs are hard to utilize effciently. GCN is changing this, it should be approximately equal to Fermi in terms of flexibility. If any ATI can be useful here it's GCN. | |
ID: 22737 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We simply have not resources to take on the debugging on all VLIW4 AMD cards. The present and the future is GCN. Then, if it happens a miracle and the stability of VLIW4 is good, then we can also release for that. But again, running gpugrid on VLIW4 cards is very inefficient. | |
ID: 22740 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
As well as VLIW5, I take it? | |
ID: 22742 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
GCN is now 1D Shader or like some say 16D? :confused | |
ID: 22758 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
maybe opencl can open a door and could be easier to handle within a timescale ?? | |
ID: 22766 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
if you like to "fold" some aminoacids/proteins with your GPU, you now can try POEM@Home and their new open CL app. | |
ID: 22786 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I'm still hoping to get some wu's for my AMD-Cards ... | |
ID: 22789 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
if you like to "fold" some aminoacids/proteins with your GPU, you now can try POEM@Home and their new open CL app. I'm still waiting for the windows version and the gpu version of hcc over at wcg. The system requirements on this project are too high. I'm out. | |
ID: 22790 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I wait also windows app. :-) | |
ID: 22792 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I'm about to look up the HD 7970 and check if it fits my rather tight power limit requirements, or if I need to wait for a later board in that series that does. | |
ID: 22796 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
POEM did it, and you ? | |
ID: 22808 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Expect to pay over $500 for the 7970, at least right at first anyway ... | |
ID: 22811 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
GDF made the decision that GPUGrid will only try to use GCN based AMD GPU's due to the relatively poor performance of existing AMD models (up to and including the 6000 series), and presumably logistical reasons. Basically, this will limit any GPUGrid app to the high and probably mid range 7000 series AMD GPU's; Radeon HD 7970, 7950, 7990 and probably 7870 and 7850. I doubt if the intermediate 7770 and 7750 GPU's would be usable (depends on performance/GCN). Obviously testing can't happen until the GPU's have been released and the researchers have a GPU to test. STEVE pointed out the high costs, 'over $500 for the 7970'. Good point, there might not be a massive demand for an AMD app. I suspect cards might trickle out in pairs rather than all get released at once and the 7990 is not due until March. | |
ID: 22813 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
HI, | |
ID: 22814 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
GDF made the decision that GPUGrid will only try to use GCN based AMD GPU's due to the relatively poor performance of existing AMD models (up to and including the 6000 series), and presumably logistical reasons. Basically, this will limit any GPUGrid app to the high and probably mid range 7000 series AMD GPU's; Radeon HD 7970, 7950, 7990 and probably 7870 and 7850. I doubt if the intermediate 7770 and 7750 GPU's would be usable (depends on performance/GCN). Obviously testing can't happen until the GPU's have been released and the researchers have a GPU to test. STEVE pointed out the high costs, 'over $500 for the 7970'. Good point, there might not be a massive demand for an AMD app. I suspect cards might trickle out in pairs rather than all get released at once and the 7990 is not due until March. You're wrong. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_ATI_graphics_processing_units#Southern_Islands_.28HD_7xxx.29_series The only cards that will support GCN will be 79x0. Just like 69x0 were the only ones from the 6xxx series that supported VLIW4. From my point of view, if poem did it, if folding did it, if wcg (most probably) did it, why couldn't gpugrid not do it? I would have preferred to have a low gpu utilization just like over at folding, instead of not heaving any app. The guys from SETI faced the same problem, but they bypassed by running two applications simultaneously. I actually would have wanted a low utilization since I would have let the app running non-stop while also doing other stuff on the computer. All I can say is ...¡Feliz Navidad! and see you in 1 year+, when the new fusion series is release which, hopefully, will have GCN on it. | |
ID: 22815 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Probably doesn't mean definitely. So no GCN for 7800 series, fair enough. That changes the picture, for me. In Jan there would only be two very expensive GCN cards. Don't know how worth while it would be supporting a project with say ten 7900 GPU's attached? | |
ID: 22816 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We never tested on VLIW4. Yet, I would expect marginal improvements compared to VLIW5. It's not just a problem of VLIWX, there are many more problems in those cards for compute. | |
ID: 22817 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Well, if this should or will indeed be the final verdict here, then this will be it for me! If that is all, you were able to conclude in around two years, then this is disappointing and poor! | |
ID: 22818 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I'm far from disappointed or frustrated; I was holding onto an HD5850 in the hope I could use it here, but now that POEM has launched an AMD GPU app, I am delighted I can use it there on a Bio-science project, somewhat similar to this project. Even if GPUGrid launched the AMD app, I don't think I would want to use it here - well not if it would only contribute 1/8th the performance of a comparable NVidia GPU, and we are talking about a 2088GFlops GPU performing like a GT240, and not if the performance at POEM is 4 or 5 times better. Performance is very much down to the research requirements, and GPUGrid does some of the most complex GPU research anywhere. | |
ID: 22819 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hi, | |
ID: 22821 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I have two fairly newish AMD Radeon HD 6990/ATI Radeon HD 5970 cards here, that of course do well on other projects, but will supposedly not here... If you want to contribute to this project so badly, should't you have bought a couple of not so high end nVidia cards (GTX 470, 570) instead? A project that thinks its volunteers can afford high-priced high-end cards every year, is severely mistaken, has lost it and obviously is living in a dream world! You are obviously mistaken. You have a card like that, but from the wrong vendor. Why not simply making the prerequisite of a working quantum computer, if you want to sort out only wealthy gals and guys? I do not intend to spend countless €s on new state-of-the-art GPU hardware every year just to be able to run your project! Your frustration speaking. I guess you would be equally frustrated from a ridiculously performing AMD client. You can use well your AMD cards elsewhere, so there is no loss from scientific point of view. And btw regarding that there has allegedly not been enough time to take care of this matter earlier: was the new website REALLY that important for the project or the science? The old one did it for me personally quite well IMHO. This is a selfish point of view. Maybe the old server software and website didn't do so well for the project. Sorry, this becomes frustrating and unnerving! Every new post in here makes one think: "Oooh, now there is good news!" and the news just go from bad to worse! See this post. Ban me, if you must, for I am beginning to not care anymore! AMD should be banned for making their customers believe that their GPUs can do everything that nVidia GPUs can. However they will catch up with their new GCN architecture. | |
ID: 22822 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
A project that thinks its volunteers can afford high-priced high-end cards every year, is severely mistaken, has lost it and obviously is living in a dream world! You are the one living in a dream world. They don't think volunteers can afford expensive cards every year. The reason they will not support the current crop of AMD GPUs is because they cannot get their algorithm to work well on it. It does *not* matter how many other projects have their code running on AMD, the only thing that matters is the fact that the GPUgrid code does not run well on current AMDs. Maybe with more time and effort it could be done but the developers have made it clear they have invested all the time and effort they can. You have to get used to the idea that project admins are not born to serve us and cater to our demands to make their project run on our hardware and no amount of whining and bellyaching from you is going to change that. Accept it like an adult and move on. I do not intend to spend countless €s on new state-of-the-art GPU hardware every year just to be able to run your project! You don't have infinite amounts of money and they don't have infinite amounts of time. Yet you expect them to spend countless hours developing for your hardware! That isn't the way the world works. Successful people know when it's time to stop flogging a dead horse and move on. As far as GPUgrid computations are concerned, your AMD is a dead horse and it isn't going to run no matter how hard you/they flog it. It's time to bury the horse and move on to something productive. And btw regarding that there has allegedly not been enough time to take care of this matter earlier: was the new website REALLY that important for the project or the science? The old one did it for me personally quite well IMHO. The old website and server sucked. This one is much better and the time they invested in that was well spent. Sorry, this becomes frustrating and unnerving! Every new post in here makes one think: "Oooh, now there is good news!" and the news just go from bad to worse! Awwwwww! I'm so sad for you. Maybe in the future the developers should just say nothing about anything they try just so you won't be disappointed? Do you promise to then say nothing concerning the fact the developers say nothing? Have a nice Christmas though and I hope Santa is putting a thousand brand new, top model AMD Radeon HD 7990 under your Christmas trees even before release date, or however the enthusiast card will be named then! ;) Merry Christmas. I hope Santa brings you one too. Ban me, if you must, for I am beginning to not care anymore! Do you think we care that you don't care? The only one you seem to care about is you. You don't care about what the devs have tried to do and why it won't work. Why should anybody care about you not caring? | |
ID: 22823 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I do not intend to spend countless €s on new state-of-the-art GPU hardware every year just to be able to run your project! Christopher, there are plenty of low cost options for running GPUGRID if you really want to. I recently bought a b-stock GTX275 SC from EVGA for < $150 shipped. Damn thing gets ~100K/day as long as my network's not futzing out. I've seen GTX260s on e-bay for as little as $40, and they're good for 45-50K/day (maybe more). My point is that with a little looking, one doesn't have to spend much at all to volunteer here. But if you're just dead set on running AMD and nothing else, I'm afraid you're going to have to be a little more patient. Cheers! | |
ID: 22825 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Big Question at the Projectteam here: | |
ID: 22942 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Or Timo from POEM since he got the application running with OpenCL. | |
ID: 22945 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Cite from another thread: GDF wrote: If all goes well, there are good chances that we will be able to provide a new AMD application very soon for all type of cards which are supporting OpenCL, not only GCN. We are already testing now. MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 | |
ID: 23175 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
If you have an ATI card please attach to this satellite project of gpugrid. | |
ID: 23314 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
You've been serious about this, haven't you? ;) | |
ID: 23320 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
It's a nice idea, but I'd rather donate my GPU resources in a more "scientific" way through GPUGRID. | |
ID: 23322 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
For me the bitcoin network is an impressive idea. Read about it: | |
ID: 23326 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I'll give it a try. | |
ID: 23327 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
For me the bitcoin network is an impressive idea. Read about it: But the Project it's self say's you won't be getting any Bitcoin's ... Also other than saying it gives BOINC Credits no where at or on the Site does anything indicate it's a BOINC Project, at least I couldn't find anything ... What is donate@home? ____________ STE\/E | |
ID: 23328 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
HI Steve. We will add that this is using BOINC. | |
ID: 23331 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
If I understand correctly this is just a testing phase to get the project started. | |
ID: 23333 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
HI Steve. We will add that this is using BOINC. The Project says: You don’t gain bitcoins in this project. was my 1'st point. Maybe the GPUGrid Project gets the BitCoins ??? but from what I read the Participants don't. Not that that bothers me as I don't have anything to do with BitCoins anyway, at least not at this time anyway ... ____________ STE\/E | |
ID: 23335 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Keeps telling me I'm using the wrong url even though I've tried the proper one 3 times ... | |
ID: 23336 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
yes the right url is | |
ID: 23337 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
no comment | |
ID: 23382 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
GDF, why don't you give away resources of people, who came here to crunch for science, to render commercial graphics? it will bring you even more money, and stable payouts | |
ID: 23383 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Sounds fishy. Somehow feels like a scam. Didn't expect this from medical boinc project. I think i will quit gpugrid and move to other projects untill they too start to try make money out of crunching power. | |
ID: 23395 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
It's to sponsor their project, not personal gain. | |
ID: 23399 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Sounds fishy. Somehow feels like a scam. Didn't expect this from medical boinc project. I think i will quit gpugrid and move to other projects untill they too start to try make money out of crunching power. Can you please clarify what you mean by "Sounds fishy" and "Somehow feels like a scam" | |
ID: 23404 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
How's the progress coming along? | |
ID: 24409 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
How's the progress coming along? http://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=2778 | |
ID: 24435 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hello everyone, I resurrect this topic to know if there is any minimal hope of having an application for GPUs of this brand now acquired and changed in AMD for several years? | |
ID: 59705 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : GPUGRID and ATI