Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : Question for new gtx / rtx
Author | Message |
---|---|
Hello the world, | |
ID: 54997 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I have 2 GTX 1060s on a MB with a i7-7700K in a mid tower recycled from a Pentium III computer shop build. | |
ID: 54999 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I would always recommend the newest generation of video cards. | |
ID: 55000 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Good call, Klepel. Look what userbenchmark.com says: | |
ID: 55002 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
1060-3GBs are getting cheaper, I just bought a new ASUS (Dual OC) for $200. It looks like the 1650Super is faster and less money than the 10603GB. https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-1060-3GB-vs-Nvidia-GTX-1650S-Super/3646vs4058 | |
ID: 55003 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Underclocking and/or undervolting would help you to lower the temperatures... Too bad it isn't available in Linux. | |
ID: 55012 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Underclocking and/or undervolting would help you to lower the temperatures... Too bad it isn't available in Linux. You can underclock in linux if you want. But you really don’t want to do that. You want to run the same clocks but less volts. Power limiting + overclock will do that. Undervolting in Windows is largely the same process. Recent nvidia cards even in Windows you don’t have real control of the voltage. The “voltage” slider doesn’t control actual voltage anymore, just max allowable, the card still pretty much decides what voltage you run since you can’t drag the slider lower than 0. But the power limit + OC indirectly pulls the voltage down since that’s the only thing the card can adjust to keep power draw below the limit while still trying to give you more clocks. ____________ | |
ID: 55013 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Ola, ServicEnginIC! | |
ID: 55014 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hi guys, | |
ID: 55020 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We need your experience in high ambient temp multiple GPU application here. I was planning to retire my least efficient GPU (a GTX 950) and replacing it for a more efficient one. Looking to my particular efficiency table, from Low power GPUs performance comparative thread, I was pretty sure to decide for a GTX 1650, but I had tested four different cards based on this GPU so far. Finally, I acquired a second GTX 1650 like this. Several reasons for this decision: - This is the best performance model, due to its aggressive factory overclocking. - To allow this overclocking, TDP is increased from stock 75W to 85W. You may ask: What's the benefit for this? Answer: A 6 pin external power connector is present on this card, missing at the other models. This gives more stability and flexibility when installing in multi GPU motherboards (with two or more PCIE x16 slots). Even so, there is a 15W power save, comparing to previous GTX 950 TDP of 100W, with about a 70% performance increase. - Also, for a better cooling, this card mounts a heat pipe based heatsink, being more efficient at heat dissipation than passive ones. On this triple GPU system, it maintains consistently 67 ºC at full power, at a room temperature of 26 ºC and stock fan curve. | |
ID: 55059 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : Question for new gtx / rtx