Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : Few questions
Author | Message |
---|---|
Hi all, just a few questions before I grab two more cards. | |
ID: 6684 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
2. I'm looking for two cards, what's the best price/performance ratio? Should currently be the GTX 260 Core 216, preferrably 55 nm. The 96 shader 9600GSO also has a good ratio, but that kind of defeats the purpose of buying 2 cards in the first place. We had quite a discussion on this.. can't remember the exact title though. "what's the best card" maybe? 3. Higher core/shader more important than memory when overclocking? Yes. 4. Is there a chart somewhere that ranks all the cards by performance? We also had a rough one, but it's quite outdated. Currently you have all chips prior to GT200 (GTX 260, 280, 285 & 295), e.g. 8600GT, 8800GT, 9800GTX. For them the speed is (for all practical purposes) proportional to the FLOPS, that is number of shaders * shader clock * instructions per clock. These numbers can be found here. Within the family of GT200 chips the same holds true, but the generations can not be compared directly. GT200 has about a 30% speed advantage at the same theoretical FLOPS. MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 | |
ID: 6693 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I was thinking of grabbing two of the 9600 GSO (96 shader) since I don't have the PSU to run two of the 200 series. It would be either two 9800GT or two 9600GSO. | |
ID: 6694 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I was thinking of grabbing two of the 9600 GSO (96 shader) since I don't have the PSU to run two of the 200 series. It would be either two 9800GT or two 9600GSO. see here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Nvidia_Graphics_Processing_Units The 9600GSO is highly overclockable (lots of factory OC's available) so that it can break the 500 GFLOPs level and be very comparable to the factory 9800GT. With the 30% adjustment noted by ETA, the 260GTX 216 will be very similar in total performance to two of either of the other cards. Of course, if your PS can handle the load, others have successfully mixed and matched different NVIDIA boards (e.g., Paul Buck) to add computational power such that adding a 9600GSO to your 260GTX should be possible (and only 84watts max extra draw). | |
ID: 6701 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
...... if you have multiple cards, SLi must be disabled & under Vista you will need to 'fool' the OS into thinking you have a monitor attached to both cards .... with the desktop extended onto both. | |
ID: 6707 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I was thinking of grabbing two of the 9600 GSO (96 shader) since I don't have the PSU to run two of the 200 series. If you've already got a 65nm GTX 260 Core 216 on your power supply, you might be able to run a single 55nm GTX 295. For a bit more than twice the cost, it has a bit more than twice the performance of a GTX 260, but uses less than twice the power as a 65nm GTX 260. The only disadvantage I've noticed is the relatively loud fan of the GTX 295 at full speed compared to the fan speed of a 65nm GTX 260 that's set to maintain the same temperature. That said, with good case cooling the fan doesn't need to run so fast and loud anyway. | |
ID: 6754 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I was thinking of grabbing two of the 9600 GSO (96 shader) since I don't have the PSU to run two of the 200 series. All I have is a Corsair VX550W, so either way, I don't have anymore PEI-E cables. It only has two. :( If there was one more, I could have thrown another 9600GSO or 9800GT into this rig. With both cards on stock, how does two 9800GT perform compared to a Core 216 260 (55nm)? Might get this over two 9800GTs: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130448 | |
ID: 6759 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
When Paul added a GTX 280 his system drew 160W more at the wall. In our forum some people reported an increase of ~100W for a GTX 260 running GPU-Grid. So.. overloading / killing your PSU is not a good idea, but generally GPUs draw less power than most people think after looking at their specs. | |
ID: 6762 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
When Paul added a GTX 280 his system drew 160W more at the wall. In our forum some people reported an increase of ~100W for a GTX 260 running GPU-Grid. So.. overloading / killing your PSU is not a good idea, but generally GPUs draw less power than most people think after looking at their specs. It's not so much the power draw from the PSU.. but the fact that my PSU only has 2 PCI-E connectors. | |
ID: 6764 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
That's what adaptors are made for ;) | |
ID: 6765 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
All I have is a Corsair VX550W, so either way, I don't have anymore PEI-E cables. It only has two. :( If you could part with the GTX 260, the GTX 295 also only requires two PCI-E power cables, one eight pin and one six pin. I did a quick search on that Corsair VX550W power supply, and found the +12 V rail rated at 41 A. The recommended +12 V PSU current rating for the GTX 295 is 46 A. So close... | |
ID: 6766 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
..... Manufacturers want to sell PSUs - I have a 295 and a 260 running on a 700w PSu, 2x280 + 260 on a 900w PSU .....a PC Power & Cooling 610 will run a pair of 280s. | |
ID: 6767 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
..... Manufacturers want to sell PSUs - I have a 295 and a 260 running on a 700w PSu, 2x280 + 260 on a 900w PSU .....a PC Power & Cooling 610 will run a pair of 280s. I have a Q6600 and E6600 system. One Corsair VX550W and one Antec Earthwatts 500W. I'm not interested in spending money on a new PSU. I just want to work with what I have at the moment. GTX 295 = $500.. I'm not really interested. I'd rather get a 260 55nm 216 for $200 to pair with my current 260. | |
ID: 6769 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
If you've the slots for them, going for a pair of 55nm GTX 260's offers the best performance at those prices. An overclocked pair can equal a single stock GTX 295. Have you already got a 55nm GTX 260? If you do, I would bet that your current power supply has just enough current available on the +12 V rail to power a pair. | |
ID: 6797 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
1 - You will need a load on all video cards if you are running Vista. You do not if you are running XP. I do not think you need it for linux either but am not sure. | |
ID: 6799 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : Few questions